The word "equality" doesn't appear in the Declaration of Independence either.
I interpreted you as approving of the fact that only property owners could vote. It's something a lot of right liberals say today.
That's how the US Constitution was originally written, and yes, I think that was much better than what we have now where people who no ability to contribute to society or vested interest in the success of the country are being catered to by politicians looking to buy their votes with the taxes they take from those who do contribute.
I don't understand this argument. You are implying that the lack of power in the Presidency means there is no ruling class.
No, I'm asking you to explain WHO the ruling class were, because they clearly weren't the politicians, and if they weren't the politicians, how did they rule? Influence was greatly limited by geography at the time. It was nothing like it is today. Unless you could literally deploy force over a large geographical area, your ability to "rule" was extremely limited.
Actually, nevermind. I don't really care. Let's move on.
Sure. You can see liberalism obfuscating power relations in a topic we are discussing now, restricted suffrage. This topic obfuscates power relations when it comes up in its usual form because the implication is that society is going to shit because we gave too much power to the wrong type of plebes. In reality, it's going to shit because of the people with the most amount of power.
I can't see any of this, sorry. You're going to have to be more specific. I don't think you actually understand what liberalism is. You speak in generalities but you don't seem to be able to provide specific examples.
Give me a specific example of how liberalism is obfuscating power relations on the topic of voting rights. I've already addressed the fact that "equality" as you are using it isn't part of liberalism.
As I said, to Gizortnik, history backs up my claim that liberalism destroy traditions. What traditions are being preserved by liberalism? How is it even helping?
Can you provide examples? What traditions?
Religious traditions have been passed down in the USA for hundreds of years. Family traditions, holiday traditions, likewise. What exactly are you talking about and how did liberalism destroy them?
I don't think we're going to agree on any of this, but I want to give it another try.
The word "equality" doesn't appear in the Declaration of Independence either.
That's how the US Constitution was originally written, and yes, I think that was much better than what we have now where people who no ability to contribute to society or vested interest in the success of the country are being catered to by politicians looking to buy their votes with the taxes they take from those who do contribute.
No, I'm asking you to explain WHO the ruling class were, because they clearly weren't the politicians, and if they weren't the politicians, how did they rule? Influence was greatly limited by geography at the time. It was nothing like it is today. Unless you could literally deploy force over a large geographical area, your ability to "rule" was extremely limited.
Actually, nevermind. I don't really care. Let's move on.
I can't see any of this, sorry. You're going to have to be more specific. I don't think you actually understand what liberalism is. You speak in generalities but you don't seem to be able to provide specific examples.
Give me a specific example of how liberalism is obfuscating power relations on the topic of voting rights. I've already addressed the fact that "equality" as you are using it isn't part of liberalism.
Can you provide examples? What traditions?
Religious traditions have been passed down in the USA for hundreds of years. Family traditions, holiday traditions, likewise. What exactly are you talking about and how did liberalism destroy them?
I don't think we're going to agree on any of this, but I want to give it another try.