Lately I kept hearing about Andrew Tate and went and search for his video and open up about everything. If you have 2 hours, I find it completely worth it to watch to the end. All he talks is here is why he is called misogynist and why he decided to go back to the religion with another well-known e-celeb, Zuby. If you just want the gist, watching just 30 minutes is enough to understand why MSM has hateboner for him.
On the other hand we have this guy MSM falling over to be his cockstrap and writing fluff piece and trying to bury the recent fuckup under the carpet. For people like me that already are in the know must understand why it is the way it is, still this huge blatant discrepancy is interesting, the way MSM was sucking him off before because this guy advertised himself as being all about "the agenda". The very fact I'm posting this thread here is evident enough. I think people in KIA reddit or kiwifarm will not notice the discrepancy. Sure some of them will get this topic but I feel the majority would just repeat the MSM talking points and attack the messenger
I've been thinking about this but after watching this video, it would be better to get off the anglo-western countries. It's not just politics, status quo and entertainment that are corrupt but sometimes I think western countries need to be completely destroyed and built back again to get back to normal, well-functioning society. As it is as of now, it's impossible to get it back to functioning society, too many bad actors hiding and pretending to contribute for the good.
Why do I have to tell you this? Destroying our entire country is a bad thing.
Our degenerated civilization needs to be changed, but that doesn't mean you fucking pulverize the entire legal system, burn down every building, demolish every church, and try and do some fucking Year Zero bullshit. That is Leftist garbage.
You start by fucking re-moralizing at the personal and local level, slowly working your way up, and getting everyone to be a pillar of their community.
In reality, the difference between these two is that Tate is an edgy e-Celeb grifter, and Bankman is a fucking billionaire who was funding the Democratic machine. No shit they got treated differently.
Try doing that now. Talk is cheap as motherfucker.
Not just a fucking billionaire but pretend to be a philanthropist and believer in left-wing political talking point is why msm treats him like a fucking kid glove but once again you pretend like you don't see that. As for Tate, grifter he may be, he has a fucking point. You cannot make a family in this kind of fucking society is what I'm saying. This is why I'm saying there's no saving the west. We have people like you believing in idealistic dream of uniting people together to work things out little by little. When people can't even punish those real grifters that made the vaccine, there's not a fucking chance to revert things back.
I'm actually trying to do that.
... I pointed out that he was funding them...
Sure you can, you'll need to protect them more from institutions, but you can absolutely build a family.
Blackpills are enemy propaganda.
Yes, remoralization on the basis of family units and community forming is how you build a civilization from scratch.
I'm not going back, I'm going forwards so that our grandchildren can have a future that is similar to the one our grandfathers grew up in.
Oh I'm well aware of this long march towards the institution. But one I point the blame to is Antonio Gramsci. Marxist faggots should thank this fucker that they are this influential and powerful.