Was watching the Timcast with Milo on and thought this point in particular deserved seperate discussion given not just recent but years of events.
The point Milo raised was that the ammendments in America can only work with a Christian society, the 2nd only works if you value life and the 1st only works in a society that regularly attends confession. He obviously has a bias but I want to expand that.
We can see that there's two aspects that is really damaging western society, constant attacks on Christianity and not really any other religion (Jew's get few but quickly slapped down by establishment) and a more individualistic view of the world.
For Democracy to work you need everyone to have a stake in it, everyone to share the same morality and everyone to want to improve their communities. On all fronts we've seen either a decrease or an abandonment of each of these values thanks to education policies, media and mass illegal immigration from conflicting cultures.
So the questions, can Democracy only exist in a fully Christian society, should the West no longer be a democracy and if so what system should take it's place, obviously not communism as no matter what that never works.
A fully christian country would be a Theocracy. As far from a democracy as can be. It'd also be doing full identity politics to cancel/excommunicate hate speech/blasphemers who are not *insert ideology/religion" here.
Historically this is a falsehood. There were plenty of fully cultural Christian countries, and even with explicitly religious rulers (England for example) that did not automatically become theocracies and use identity politics as we understand them. Do try and understand the past a bit better than a leftist does.
A Christian leader is far different from a leader who is a pastor.