I was reading this article this article about the Metaverse when it hit me where all the mistakes were being made.
It’s all about experiences
Roblox is making this huge splash and is being sold as toys and cultural items at an amazing rate. My Walmart has movie toys, but they're obviously for adults and come with higher pricing. The Roblox toys are mostly sold out. The same can be said about Minecraft. The local book store sells more Minecraft books and Roblox books than stuff about cartoons or movies.
The games create an experience, and the fans love that. Facebook can't create that, so they've created a false version of the idea, and are paying for nice articles about their ideas.
The word Experience is being used carefully, because it's expected to become the next big thing. There is a book on it and everything. The problem is, the experience economy has been slowed or not moving the way the really big names want. Meta wants to create the Experience, but has no clue how that works. It's a buzzword and not an understanding. It's the Kinect vs the Wii all over again. The Kinect was a great piece of kit and I loved it, but the entire game design and promotion was a false idea on why the Wii worked so well.
We've already seen the Metaverse on PS3 and it was a similar result. Yet, every few years some big name wants to make it again. I suspect they read too many people read Snow Crash which influenced so many books, anime, movies, and game designers.
What did we skip over to?
I reread your comment to get better context. I agree, Minecraft, Roblox, and others are Metaverse and have been winning for a while. The attempt to seclude the person into immersion does not seem to be as popular as the tech companies want. They want control, and being able to leave means they can't have that. It's why the word Immersion gets misused.
So the entire idea is stuck in 1997 and the office workers haven't caught on to what is happening now?
It's Cyberpunk fetishism, in a way. Neuromancer required inventing the Matrix because the internet didn't exist to draw inspiration from yet. This has become retro-future in the 40 years since it's invention, and should be regarded as seriously as valve computers or space-faring zeppelins.
Good point. I saw Blade Runner the other day and had a similar thought.