D&D: Devils don't have to be evil
(nitter.net)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I really do not get this, at all. Devils by definition are evil. They sometimes do things that are good if it serves their own interests or an evil interest like getting them more souls but anyway the 5'th edition is turning to crap, I just hate this deconstruction of evil. The entire foundation of DnD was with alignments and the idea of evil gods, good gods, evil creatures and good creatures. Bleah I just hate this changes and I'm trying really hard not to hate the designers. You do not have to use any of this but I see no reason not to play AD&D or 3.5, there is so much material to play with.
If you are going to play an out-of-print version play the Rules Cyclopedia, which is what eventually became of the Basic, Expert, Companion & Advanced Box sets. It is generally a simpler and more refined version of rules than AD&D 1st or 2nd Edition.
3.5 was fine, but there are better fantasy RPG settings and rules. Personally, I'd rather play EarthDawn.
It is almost certainly available on the high seas, if you go looking.
https://caressofsteel.github.io/demos/dndrulescyclopedia/
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/17171/DD-Rules-Cyclopedia-Basic