Shitlibs instinctively gravitate towards the therapeutic narratives. As in societal conflicts, they consider themselves to hold the one true objective scientific stance and therefore people believing anything else are somehow pathological and need to be either treated ("just go to therapy chud") or sectioned/quarantine'd. In case you are stuck at the start line, they don't care about winning le epic battle of ideas in the free marketplace or whatever horseshit morons fell for in the 1950s and keep doing so to this day, they are interested in power and using that power to punish chuds.
In this particular case, they take the tech-equivalent route of therapeutic management, which is security fagging. It is somewhat novel approach, in it that they do not have specially crafted words and concepts for ideologically-based security vulnerability, but this works for now until some epic paper/presentation introduces a new word for chuds being problematic from security standpoint.
Shitlibs instinctively gravitate towards the therapeutic narratives. As in societal conflicts, they consider themselves to hold the one true objective scientific stance and therefore people believing anything else are somehow pathological and need to be either treated ("just go to therapy chud") or sectioned/quarantine'd. In case you are stuck at the start line, they don't care about winning le epic battle of ideas in the free marketplace or whatever horseshit morons fell for in the 1950s and keep doing so to this day, they are interested in power and using that power to punish chuds.
In this particular case, they take the tech-equivalent route of therapeutic management, which is security fagging. It is somewhat novel approach, in it that they do not have specially crafted words and concepts for ideologically-based security vulnerability, but this works for now until some epic paper/presentation introduces a new word for chuds being problematic from security standpoint.
Good analysis. Basically the tech version of patholigization.