So...a majority? Don't be shy, tell us what you really want.
I mean, I already know. But I wish you'd outright say it so I don't sound crazy.
We don’t finance women’s campaigns the way we finance men’s. That’s a great problem.
Women are free to fund their own genocide supporting psychos. The reason most of the feminist backed politicians don't get funding is because their beliefs are radicalized, stochastic terrorism that is unpalatable to people with human emotions.
I am wildly surprised you of all people used the term 'stochastic terrorism' which is just academic talk for "i can't find any direcy causality but my feelings tell me it's true."
That's how they use it, but it actually has a definition that fits feminists really well.
the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of an act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted
It isn't confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that the feminist rhetoric of wanting all men dead is resulting in higher male suicides or more abused kids, but it's extremely likely.
If you want to assert feminist rhetoric is leading to increased male suicides you can't just hypothesize that and assert it as logically likely -- you have to show some sort of causation.
So...a majority? Don't be shy, tell us what you really want.
I mean, I already know. But I wish you'd outright say it so I don't sound crazy.
Women are free to fund their own genocide supporting psychos. The reason most of the feminist backed politicians don't get funding is because their beliefs are radicalized, stochastic terrorism that is unpalatable to people with human emotions.
I am wildly surprised you of all people used the term 'stochastic terrorism' which is just academic talk for "i can't find any direcy causality but my feelings tell me it's true."
Other than that, agree.
That's how they use it, but it actually has a definition that fits feminists really well.
It isn't confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that the feminist rhetoric of wanting all men dead is resulting in higher male suicides or more abused kids, but it's extremely likely.
No it's not.
If you want to assert feminist rhetoric is leading to increased male suicides you can't just hypothesize that and assert it as logically likely -- you have to show some sort of causation.