''It's not censorship if I agree with the removal.''
Can't argue with a pigeon accusing you of being a racist pedo familyfucker, ''etc'' (because the list of what they want censored is quite long and hypocritical ) for explaining what is censorship.
Something tells me there is no need to remove sexism against men and racism against Whites, in the pigeon's mind...
What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship we're honest and point out that what we want done would unironically improve media quality.
An example of this would be censoring regressive leftist bullshit and related garbage by altering lines to make them apolitical, such as by replacing the word
"sexist" with "pervert" to remove non-negative references to objectification theory.
''It's not censorship if I agree with the removal.''
Can't argue with a pigeon accusing you of being a racist pedo familyfucker, ''etc'' (because the list of what they want censored is quite long and hypocritical ) for explaining what is censorship.
Something tells me there is no need to remove sexism against men and racism against Whites, in the pigeon's mind...
What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship we're honest and point out that what we want done would unironically improve media quality.
An example of this would be censoring regressive leftist bullshit and related garbage by altering lines to make them apolitical, such as by replacing the word "sexist" with "pervert" to remove non-negative references to objectification theory.