On one hand, I want financial services to be considered effectively a civil right.
On the other hand, that makes it a kind of positive right (which doesn't solve the root of the problem),
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. A couple of positive rights ensuring access to the commons and public square is fine for now. Until you can get people to understand the distinction between positive and negative rights, there's no real downside to that.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. A couple of positive rights ensuring access to the commons and public square is fine for now. Until you can get people to understand the distinction between positive and negative rights, there's no real downside to that.