So desperate to kill young men for their feminist paymasters.
Also, Antonio, you told me they would drop this issue, but it looks like we are progressing as I expected.
Expecting 1 in ~3,000 myocarditis rate after 4th jab is recommended for young people to keep the prediction in line, then 1 in ~1,800 after 5th to confirm the trend is correct. I expect they'll start fudging the data at this point by counting trans males (women) as men.
So desperate to kill young men for their feminist paymasters.
Have you ever thought of weaponizing your autism against something other than your own heart health?
Also, Antonio, you told me they would drop this issue, but it looks like we are progressing as I expected.
Yes, we're at the 90% death rate you predicted. I do stand by my prediction that if there is even a 5% death rate, those same feminists you claim "want to kill young men" will be leading the charge for firing squads for the powers that be.. because their precious Johnny died.
Also, no one cares about Covid anymore. They can continue yapping about it, but it won't work. Those who are most at risk will continue taking vaccines for years to come, probably. Not young men.
Scaling can be incorrect and the actual data can still be correct.
I'm still in line with the list of figures I wrote down based on studies I had read. If it stays in line, a 100% vaccination rate really would have killed, or at least damaged the hearts of, 90% of young men.
Scaling can be incorrect and the actual data can still be correct.
At the time, I told you how stupid you were being. Imagine even a 5% death rate from the vaccine, let alone an 80% death rate. You, in your genius, predicted that the 20% of the remaining world population would obediently go take the next booster as people were dropping dead left and right.
That's what I call stupid. Hell, that's what everyone calls stupid. You have your bizarre claims about people being after you and trying to kill you, and you try to fit literally everything in that fold: the war in Ukraine was started by Lithuania to kill men, the virus was created to kill men, the vaccine was created to kill men, Kim Potter saw the chance to kill a man. This is not normal.
I'm still in line
BERNIE CAN STILL WIN 2016!!!!
with the list of figures I wrote down based on studies I had read.
Where? The Journal of HELP WOMEN ARE TRYING TO KILL ME?
If it stays in line, a 100% vaccination rate really would have killed 90% of young men.
What you think would happen if people everywhere lost 90% of their brothers, sons, fathers, uncles, etc.? And the powers that be were to blame for it?
You're forgetting that they could just say it was a new variant. In a world where everyone believes Covid hysteria to the point of near 100% compliance, they probably wouldn't even make the link.
I posted it here a long while ago, it said that myocarditis rates appeared to be increasing after every booster, and I tried to make a formula to state where it would go next based on those limited data points.
It went 100,000 > 10,000 > 5,000 > 3,000 > 1,800 and I forget how it went after that, but it was 10% of the population after 10 and 90% after 20.
So desperate to kill young men for their feminist paymasters.
Also, Antonio, you told me they would drop this issue, but it looks like we are progressing as I expected.
Expecting 1 in ~3,000 myocarditis rate after 4th jab is recommended for young people to keep the prediction in line, then 1 in ~1,800 after 5th to confirm the trend is correct. I expect they'll start fudging the data at this point by counting trans males (women) as men.
Have you ever thought of weaponizing your autism against something other than your own heart health?
Yes, we're at the 90% death rate you predicted. I do stand by my prediction that if there is even a 5% death rate, those same feminists you claim "want to kill young men" will be leading the charge for firing squads for the powers that be.. because their precious Johnny died.
Also, no one cares about Covid anymore. They can continue yapping about it, but it won't work. Those who are most at risk will continue taking vaccines for years to come, probably. Not young men.
Scaling can be incorrect and the actual data can still be correct.
I'm still in line with the list of figures I wrote down based on studies I had read. If it stays in line, a 100% vaccination rate really would have killed, or at least damaged the hearts of, 90% of young men.
At the time, I told you how stupid you were being. Imagine even a 5% death rate from the vaccine, let alone an 80% death rate. You, in your genius, predicted that the 20% of the remaining world population would obediently go take the next booster as people were dropping dead left and right.
That's what I call stupid. Hell, that's what everyone calls stupid. You have your bizarre claims about people being after you and trying to kill you, and you try to fit literally everything in that fold: the war in Ukraine was started by Lithuania to kill men, the virus was created to kill men, the vaccine was created to kill men, Kim Potter saw the chance to kill a man. This is not normal.
BERNIE CAN STILL WIN 2016!!!!
Where? The Journal of HELP WOMEN ARE TRYING TO KILL ME?
What you think would happen if people everywhere lost 90% of their brothers, sons, fathers, uncles, etc.? And the powers that be were to blame for it?
You can't see past the end of your nose.
You're forgetting that they could just say it was a new variant. In a world where everyone believes Covid hysteria to the point of near 100% compliance, they probably wouldn't even make the link.
I posted it here a long while ago, it said that myocarditis rates appeared to be increasing after every booster, and I tried to make a formula to state where it would go next based on those limited data points.
It went 100,000 > 10,000 > 5,000 > 3,000 > 1,800 and I forget how it went after that, but it was 10% of the population after 10 and 90% after 20.