Democrats name bills like the protections of puppies act and routinely have the majority of bill involves anything but the title at best and worse actually do the opposite of the title. They then use those no votes in ads in the general elections knowing their base and demographics will not research what was actually in the bill thinking the Republican is a monster for not voting for the “protections of puppies” bill. despite the bill having a section for if a puppy is not adopted in 3 days after arriving in a shelter it gets thrown alive into a meat grinder and fed to circus animals.
Obviously hyperbolic but that’s typically how it goes. Or they will sneak a gun control section or massive increase in funding for some stupid pet project.
Democrats name bills like the protections of puppies act and routinely have the majority of bill involves anything but the title at best and worse actually do the opposite of the title. They then use those no votes in ads in the general elections knowing their base and demographics will not research what was actually in the bill thinking the Republican is a monster for not voting for the “protections of puppies” bill. despite the bill having a section for if a puppy is not adopted in 3 days after arriving in a shelter it gets thrown alive into a meat grinder and fed to circus animals.
Obviously hyperbolic but that’s typically how it goes. Or they will sneak a gun control section or massive increase in funding for some stupid pet project.
Hyperbolic? The CA 'Civil Rights Act' bill literally did nothing but strike civil rights from their state constitution.