Seriously, what's the argument for porn being speech and expression? What is the message it's trying to convey?
Edit: Guys, I'm asking if it's speech/expression and, if so, how. Most of the comments in support of it aren't answering the question, just showing their support for free speech and expression, in general. Only one guy has made a case for it, comparing it to car shows and art. And, even though I have reservations about labeling it as art, I appreciate that he's making a case for it and not just side-stepping the issue.
I guess they could argue that some of the more involved porn movies have story? Cue that old joke about reading Playboy for the articles.
Anyway if you're arguing that we should ban it you should really think twice. That would give a government infiltrated by commies the power to control what people watch, and they would probably end up banning the less degenerate stuff for "misogyny" while continuing to allow the usual victim classes to produce the really degenerate shit. Vanilla stuff with the male on top? Banned for objectifying women. Cuckold and tranny shit? It would be very problematic to prevent oppressed ppl from expressing their sexuality. So that stays. Oh and we're going to show it to your kids as well.
It would also give the government the ability to declare more loosely what is porn. And in this new world where land whales grace Calvin Klein billboards any attractive person in underwear could be labeled as porn. See London banning swimsuit and lingerie models on ads. They didn’t claim porn they claimed body positivity. But it was really just a means to an end. Enforce the mayor of Londons religious beliefs on the people of the capital.
you already lost when you have a Muslim foreigner as the mayor, Britain never had freedom of speech in the first place