Sometimes generalities are needed to advance an argument

"Damn joggers!" isn't needed, it isn't useful.

"Poor people from Detroit", no matter how the demographics pan out (it's not 100% the same ethnicity), don't represent middle class from miami.

I am unfamiliar with the ways that the UN, WHO, and WEF are manufacturing racial conflict. If you could direct me to some references that illustrate this, I'd be much obliged.

EGS and Racial Equity isn't a big secret my dude. Where have you been ?

After all, it's hard to criticize major components of racism--black culture, the rise of racist indoctrination in schools, etc.--without referring to black people in general.

What is black culture ? You know when we say "White culture" isn't a thing, because there are vast differences between Irish, Italian, French, Anglosaxxon and the other plethora of different cultures in the Euro world, that also applies to Black people.

Africa is a huge continent, then you have Islanders from Jamaica, Haiti, and then you have your Americans. So what exactly do you speak of when you say black culture ? It's not a single monolith. You mean gang-banger ghetto culture probably.

Also, Racist indoctrination in schools comes from white liberal women with saviour complex. It's not that race hustlers don't exist on the side of black people, but even most black people know Sharpton is a stooge. Because you know, just because Sharpton is an idiot doesn't mean all black people are.

Most generalisations are idiotic over simplifications and do nothing to advance discussion.