Well then, you're pretty crazy. I'm pretty sure that Clarence Thomas doesn't have daily struggles about whether or not to smash the Supreme Court to bits because he really is a wild animal at heart.
Everywhere Africans exist in any meaningful amount turns to shit very quickly.
Now that's interesting. So they do not when there is not a 'meaningful amount' of them. Why? If it's in their nature to be wild animals, why would the environment make such a difference. If I buy a house for a lion and a lioness, will they suddenly behave themselves?
I have no idea why the one black guy you can come up with that doesn't act like an animal doesn't behave like most of his kind.
I don't think most blacks act like animals. Even in the worst places you can point to, it is a small number of criminals wreaking havoc (which is why soft on crime policies are so devastating).
When they exist in small numbers, the host population can handle their violence far more easily.
Wait, so you say that even when they're there in small numbers, they're bad?
They are a pestilence.
Now you're going into crazy territory. Marking people as a pestilence based on their color, really?
Well then, you're pretty crazy. I'm pretty sure that Clarence Thomas doesn't have daily struggles about whether or not to smash the Supreme Court to bits because he really is a wild animal at heart.
Now that's interesting. So they do not when there is not a 'meaningful amount' of them. Why? If it's in their nature to be wild animals, why would the environment make such a difference. If I buy a house for a lion and a lioness, will they suddenly behave themselves?
I don't think most blacks act like animals. Even in the worst places you can point to, it is a small number of criminals wreaking havoc (which is why soft on crime policies are so devastating).
Wait, so you say that even when they're there in small numbers, they're bad?
Now you're going into crazy territory. Marking people as a pestilence based on their color, really?