That's the thing with Engineers. "Oh we planned for 1 in 100 year events, we'll be fine". Then they cry when the 1 in 500 year event happens and crushes their whole plan.
They never thought to build in a non-Tsunami area. Because that would have been way too logical.
Actually it was built where it was because it has a very solid foundation of bedrock underneath it,
Dude, stop. You're only making it worse for engineers. "Hey guys, look, this is very stable bedrock. Wait, what do you mean we're right in the path of this errupting volcano's lava flow ?".
Again, that's engineers for you. Always getting surprised by that one scenario they didn't plan for, instead of you know, just removing it entirely from the equation.
The plant also used water reactors, so putting it right near the ocean made sense.
No, since water is available outside of the ocean. Just use another water source.
That's the thing with Engineers. "Oh we planned for 1 in 100 year events, we'll be fine". Then they cry when the 1 in 500 year event happens and crushes their whole plan.
They never thought to build in a non-Tsunami area. Because that would have been way too logical.
Dude, stop. You're only making it worse for engineers. "Hey guys, look, this is very stable bedrock. Wait, what do you mean we're right in the path of this errupting volcano's lava flow ?".
Again, that's engineers for you. Always getting surprised by that one scenario they didn't plan for, instead of you know, just removing it entirely from the equation.
No, since water is available outside of the ocean. Just use another water source.
You took a simple joke about engineers over thinking things when the solution is simple into a full blown debate defending Fukushima.
Don't look at me bro. I'm not even sure why you felt you needed to defend the thing against a harmless Internet joke.
It would have been finer some place else. That's the joke.