It's smart for them in my opinion. The Republicans have a structural advantage in the Senate. They will likely retake the Senate and keep it for most of the time. Ergo, Democrats will want to have the filibuster around rather than not.
But they also need to show their base that they at least tried to codify Roe.
Does anyone have the legal chops to explain to me how codifyiing Roe or an abortion ban does not violate federalism, btw? I never see anyone say that it would, but it seems pretty open-and-shut to me.
It's smart for them in my opinion. The Republicans have a structural advantage in the Senate. They will likely retake the Senate and keep it for most of the time. Ergo, Democrats will want to have the filibuster around rather than not.
But they also need to show their base that they at least tried to codify Roe.
Does anyone have the legal chops to explain to me how codifyiing Roe or an abortion ban does not violate federalism, btw? I never see anyone say that it would, but it seems pretty open-and-shut to me.
Did Lincoln violate federalism?
Any particular examples? I'm pretty sure he was better behaved than Wilson.