I don't see where all this stated fascism and Hitler worship is coming from?
The Hitler worship is in another thread. guy saying "Hitler would be seen differently if only he spoke more of the state of degeneracy" and his upvoted +7 with 0 downvotes.
This is the kind of extremism the "no compromise" approach leads to.
I have never espoused any of these viewpoints.
You have touched on fascism. "Impose and give no grounds" requires authoritarian fascism. You know, we point that out to the left every time they want to go 0 compromise on any of their socialist viewpoints. Communism has always required a dictator. Same for any right wing perspective you're not ready to negotiate, it'll require a dictator.
It's fine to not compromise on certain things, but not everything is a constitutional right. Not everything requires planting your feet and refusing to move.
Sad that you continue to misinterpret my arguments.
Sad that you keep being blind to what has been happening in this community.
You have chided me for stating a fact that the left hates the right yet you constantly make inferences about most people somehow being fascists or Hitler worshippers off a single thread.
You misinterpret what I mean by compromises with the left.
When you give the left any ground, they push and ask for more.
Constitutional liberties have been eroded for years because "bipartisan" Republicans "compromised".
I desire an end to that nonsense.
Complete federalism allows for the left to do their own thing and for the right to do their own thing.
The problem that remains is that the left will never be happy without lording over all of us.
I personally want nothing to do with the left and am willing let them destroy their blue states as long as the right is free to do whatever with the red states.
You have chided me for stating a fact that the left hates the right
Because I feel that talking point doesn't apply to like 95% of the "left" and "right". Only vocal extremists online think in such absolutes.
When you give the left any ground, they push and ask for more.
No different than the right really. Compromise will always be a tug-o-war.
I desire an end to that nonsense.
Politics is never ending.
The problem that remains is that the left will never be happy without lording over all of us.
And from what I feel coming from your discourse, you'll never happy without lording over them. There's your common ground I guess. Too bad it's the worst possible way to approach this.
Remember : the goal of compromise is not to win the extremists over, it's to win the majority over.
I don't see where all this stated fascism and Hitler worship is coming from?
I have never espoused any of these viewpoints.
My viewpoint is simple.
You cannot compromise with or find unity with leftists who hate you and your way of life.
This simple viewpoint has nothing to do with Hitler and fascism.
Sad that you continue to misinterpret my arguments.
The Hitler worship is in another thread. guy saying "Hitler would be seen differently if only he spoke more of the state of degeneracy" and his upvoted +7 with 0 downvotes.
This is the kind of extremism the "no compromise" approach leads to.
You have touched on fascism. "Impose and give no grounds" requires authoritarian fascism. You know, we point that out to the left every time they want to go 0 compromise on any of their socialist viewpoints. Communism has always required a dictator. Same for any right wing perspective you're not ready to negotiate, it'll require a dictator.
It's fine to not compromise on certain things, but not everything is a constitutional right. Not everything requires planting your feet and refusing to move.
Sad that you keep being blind to what has been happening in this community.
You have chided me for stating a fact that the left hates the right yet you constantly make inferences about most people somehow being fascists or Hitler worshippers off a single thread.
You misinterpret what I mean by compromises with the left.
When you give the left any ground, they push and ask for more.
Constitutional liberties have been eroded for years because "bipartisan" Republicans "compromised".
I desire an end to that nonsense.
Complete federalism allows for the left to do their own thing and for the right to do their own thing.
The problem that remains is that the left will never be happy without lording over all of us.
I personally want nothing to do with the left and am willing let them destroy their blue states as long as the right is free to do whatever with the red states.
Because I feel that talking point doesn't apply to like 95% of the "left" and "right". Only vocal extremists online think in such absolutes.
No different than the right really. Compromise will always be a tug-o-war.
Politics is never ending.
And from what I feel coming from your discourse, you'll never happy without lording over them. There's your common ground I guess. Too bad it's the worst possible way to approach this.
Remember : the goal of compromise is not to win the extremists over, it's to win the majority over.