It sounds crazy but she's right, assuming there were no pushback. It's not that Straight people won't exist, but the goal is that "straight" will just be a tiny patch on the rainbow quiltbag. It won't even be straight - you'll have to pick a flavor of straight, like "Demisexual". You're not normal, you're just one of a million different alternatives no better than any other. (which conversely means no sexual preference is bad, no matter how deviant it is)
I don't think straight will even be an option in a future dominated by the alphabet community to this extent. Remember, the wokists seem to hate normality with a passion and celebrate anything that is "diverse", even if it's something that's incredibly self-destructive.
Just look at trans people or the fat acceptance movement.
I agree that there would definitely be no "straight acceptance" if the regressives had their way. Even when someone's "preference" is straight, young people will strongly be encouraged to experiment and explore pansexuality. Just look at the opposition to SuperStraight, which even if it was originally a joke they could have easily ran with it and said "Yeah go ahead that's allowed". But no, it's not allowed.
It is clever. I still think we should demand to be identified that way if they claim we can identify by however we feel. (though really sexual identity is bullshit)
It sounds crazy but she's right, assuming there were no pushback. It's not that Straight people won't exist, but the goal is that "straight" will just be a tiny patch on the rainbow quiltbag. It won't even be straight - you'll have to pick a flavor of straight, like "Demisexual". You're not normal, you're just one of a million different alternatives no better than any other. (which conversely means no sexual preference is bad, no matter how deviant it is)
I don't think straight will even be an option in a future dominated by the alphabet community to this extent. Remember, the wokists seem to hate normality with a passion and celebrate anything that is "diverse", even if it's something that's incredibly self-destructive.
Just look at trans people or the fat acceptance movement.
I agree that there would definitely be no "straight acceptance" if the regressives had their way. Even when someone's "preference" is straight, young people will strongly be encouraged to experiment and explore pansexuality. Just look at the opposition to SuperStraight, which even if it was originally a joke they could have easily ran with it and said "Yeah go ahead that's allowed". But no, it's not allowed.
SuperStraight was invented by a TERF, remember?
They thought it was oh so clever.
It is clever. I still think we should demand to be identified that way if they claim we can identify by however we feel. (though really sexual identity is bullshit)