If a mass grave of 200 Indian children truly existed, wouldn't the tribal leaders want to bring up the bones so that could be paid the respect they deserve?
The answer is obviously yes, but they know they won't find any mass graves, and so the only way to keep the grift going is to stall on that issue. I imagine when pressed they'll claim it would be a desecration to disturb the grave site.
Moral panic is right. It's all bullshit. I have no doubt there were occasional beatings and probably some molesting just like you've always found throughout the teaching profession for all of history, but mass murdering 200 children?? It's patently absurd.
What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
The people who are in it are in it for the reasons I stated. The people who are Useful Idiots to the people who are in it are just repeating what they are told.
If a mass grave of 200 Indian children truly existed, wouldn't the tribal leaders want to bring up the bones so that could be paid the respect they deserve?
The answer is obviously yes, but they know they won't find any mass graves, and so the only way to keep the grift going is to stall on that issue. I imagine when pressed they'll claim it would be a desecration to disturb the grave site.
Moral panic is right. It's all bullshit. I have no doubt there were occasional beatings and probably some molesting just like you've always found throughout the teaching profession for all of history, but mass murdering 200 children?? It's patently absurd.
What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
It's not a moral panic. It's a Red Terror.
You don't burn 64 churches with the support of the media and civil rights organizations in a "moral panic".
It can be both. People are in it for different reasons.
The people who are in it are in it for the reasons I stated. The people who are Useful Idiots to the people who are in it are just repeating what they are told.