“This wasn’t like someone asking for Ivermectin and not knowing what COVID was or how vaccines work,” he said. “These are people who actually read the studies and knew what they were asking for.

“My understanding is that doctors are allowed to prescribe things off label, which we do all the time.”

Just...wow.

So, which studies are these? The stuff Pfizer put out officially, or the stuff they were forced to release via lawsuit? The article said he was jabbing people into March, well after the first batch of Pfizer data dropped and we saw that they fudged their entire control group, that side effects were hidden, and well after the per capita rates (released by public health) of infection, hospitalization, and death in the jabbed overtook the rates in pure bloods.

This doctor would have us beleive that he looked at all this and said "This makes more sense than Ivermectin".

Note how the article doesn't link to any studies, only press releases...