I can't believe I need to explain this to someone. You're being disingenuous as hell. Distance is a factor. The greater the distance, the less commonality among people. In math it's called the inverse square law. The farther you go away from something, the less effect that thing has. This is a universal law which is applicable to everything. When applied to the real world, you get exactly this. This is how speciation and sub-speciation occurs in lifeforms. Distance.
This concept is applicable to and affects homogeneous societies and nations. Almost universally, you'll have more commonality among people closer to you than you will with people far away. This has only been intentionally changed recently due to the implementation of unnatural laws and processes (by globalists in power), including open borders, mass immigration of peoples different to the host population, and enforced propaganda of multiculturalism and diversity on the population, so they accept it. Again, this is only being pushed on white majority countries.
So, how does distance affect homogeneous nations? Single communities and cities will have people be the most common, especially in nations with freedom of movement (like the U.S.), where people can vote with their feet, and move to areas where they have more commonality with the people. The people who live closest together will generally be the most common. Further outward, states (as in the United States concept of it), provinces, or sectors will have decreasing commonality among the people as compared to groups of people in communities and cities, but more commonality than the totality of people living in the entire nation. Furthest outward, the totality of people in the nation itself will have the least commonality. Homogeneity occurs in gradation outward relative to distance. However, the people of the nation will still have a strong enough commonality as to allow the nation itself to exist as it is. Historically, if the differentiation among a nation's population gets too great, it results in subjugation and/or enforced assimilation of a specific group by the other(s), and can also result in slavery, sectarian violence, genocide, civil war, secession, balkanization, or some other form of violence or isolation of the differing peoples.
This is how you can get differentation among a nation's population. The nation will be homogeneous to some degree, but the communities, cities, and provinces of a nation will be even more homogeneous. This doesn't mean homogeneity isn't a controlling factor, only that it decreases over distance. If heterogeneity gets too great, it fractures the nation. All nations must be homogeneous to a certain extent to remain stable. The more homogeneous a nation is, the better.
Everything else you said is either a logical fallacy or some other form of misinformation, foolishness, or lie.
I see that I triggered you a lot, and went through my timeline and downvoted all of my comments. You're a weak willed faggot and a liar. Everything you say is poison. You've already admitted to who you are through your other social media channels. You are an enemy of white people everywhere, an exemplar of globalists and all their destructive machinations. You're evil. Also, I did answer you. You're just too stupid to see it, and too much of a liar to admit fault.
Appeal to popularity is a logical fallacy. Truth is what it is. It's immutable. Upvotes and downvotes, our own feelings, popularity, even if no one or everyone believes something, none of it enters the equation. Our only job is to figure it out.
You admitted to downvoting my comments unrelated to this, which shows you're vindictive, petty, and worthy of the same insult you attempt to levy against me. You're a hypocrite. I've been in a "debate" with you before. I already know who you are and how you act. You're not a good person. You're a liar. You don't prioritize truth. Attempting to debate with you would only be constructive for testing my own arguments and patience with a liar. Constructive debate requires both sides be civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above everything else. You're none of those things. I'm usually fine going into debates like that, but you disgust me.
My argument has always been that homogeneous societies are best, regardless of race or dileneation. I've already said as much. I'm not a white nationalist, I'm just a nationalist. Globalists are enemies of everyone. Everyone has the right to protect their home and control who enters, not because they hate everyone outside the walls, but because they love those within. You conflate this idea with hate, when in reality it's love of ones people. You also deny this right to white people, just like globalists. Notice how you didn't deny that you're a party and voice to globalists and their plans? You're transparent as hell. Go and downvote more of my comments if it makes you feel better. It changes nothing. Rage and scream against reality itself, because that's what you're already doing. You think you know better, not realizing you've already lost. Truth wins.
I can't believe I need to explain this to someone. You're being disingenuous as hell. Distance is a factor. The greater the distance, the less commonality among people. In math it's called the inverse square law. The farther you go away from something, the less effect that thing has. This is a universal law which is applicable to everything. When applied to the real world, you get exactly this. This is how speciation and sub-speciation occurs in lifeforms. Distance.
This concept is applicable to and affects homogeneous societies and nations. Almost universally, you'll have more commonality among people closer to you than you will with people far away. This has only been intentionally changed recently due to the implementation of unnatural laws and processes (by globalists in power), including open borders, mass immigration of peoples different to the host population, and enforced propaganda of multiculturalism and diversity on the population, so they accept it. Again, this is only being pushed on white majority countries.
So, how does distance affect homogeneous nations? Single communities and cities will have people be the most common, especially in nations with freedom of movement (like the U.S.), where people can vote with their feet, and move to areas where they have more commonality with the people. The people who live closest together will generally be the most common. Further outward, states (as in the United States concept of it), provinces, or sectors will have decreasing commonality among the people as compared to groups of people in communities and cities, but more commonality than the totality of people living in the entire nation. Furthest outward, the totality of people in the nation itself will have the least commonality. Homogeneity occurs in gradation outward relative to distance. However, the people of the nation will still have a strong enough commonality as to allow the nation itself to exist as it is. Historically, if the differentiation among a nation's population gets too great, it results in subjugation and/or enforced assimilation of a specific group by the other(s), and can also result in slavery, sectarian violence, genocide, civil war, secession, balkanization, or some other form of violence or isolation of the differing peoples.
This is how you can get differentation among a nation's population. The nation will be homogeneous to some degree, but the communities, cities, and provinces of a nation will be even more homogeneous. This doesn't mean homogeneity isn't a controlling factor, only that it decreases over distance. If heterogeneity gets too great, it fractures the nation. All nations must be homogeneous to a certain extent to remain stable. The more homogeneous a nation is, the better.
Everything else you said is either a logical fallacy or some other form of misinformation, foolishness, or lie.
I see a lot of words to avoid answering the questions. Try again.
I see that I triggered you a lot, and went through my timeline and downvoted all of my comments. You're a weak willed faggot and a liar. Everything you say is poison. You've already admitted to who you are through your other social media channels. You are an enemy of white people everywhere, an exemplar of globalists and all their destructive machinations. You're evil. Also, I did answer you. You're just too stupid to see it, and too much of a liar to admit fault.
So you care about fake epeen.
Interesting...
For you the best homogeneous society is an all white society?
I would ask you where I lied. But I feel I would get a long unhinged post with no answer. Maybe you do deserve the downvotes.
Appeal to popularity is a logical fallacy. Truth is what it is. It's immutable. Upvotes and downvotes, our own feelings, popularity, even if no one or everyone believes something, none of it enters the equation. Our only job is to figure it out.
You admitted to downvoting my comments unrelated to this, which shows you're vindictive, petty, and worthy of the same insult you attempt to levy against me. You're a hypocrite. I've been in a "debate" with you before. I already know who you are and how you act. You're not a good person. You're a liar. You don't prioritize truth. Attempting to debate with you would only be constructive for testing my own arguments and patience with a liar. Constructive debate requires both sides be civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above everything else. You're none of those things. I'm usually fine going into debates like that, but you disgust me.
My argument has always been that homogeneous societies are best, regardless of race or dileneation. I've already said as much. I'm not a white nationalist, I'm just a nationalist. Globalists are enemies of everyone. Everyone has the right to protect their home and control who enters, not because they hate everyone outside the walls, but because they love those within. You conflate this idea with hate, when in reality it's love of ones people. You also deny this right to white people, just like globalists. Notice how you didn't deny that you're a party and voice to globalists and their plans? You're transparent as hell. Go and downvote more of my comments if it makes you feel better. It changes nothing. Rage and scream against reality itself, because that's what you're already doing. You think you know better, not realizing you've already lost. Truth wins.