I need to know if he's actually talking about mass executions, or something through a proper judicial proceeding as a legal remedy.
There's a big difference between killing people on accusations and killing people as the result of a jurisdictional process, where they have been convicted. Capital Punishment is not the problem.
It's genuinely difficult to follow conversations this deeply because of all the comments and the separate chains they make. I don't have an easy parent comment that I can check in Reddit all the way to the top. I just presents me with the top level thread.
I think you did say that in one of your top comments, which is why I didn't remove it.
You are allowed to advocate for the death penalty so long as no one's being crazy about it, and you're not basically advocating for roving death squads.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
I need to know if he's actually talking about mass executions, or something through a proper judicial proceeding as a legal remedy.
There's a big difference between killing people on accusations and killing people as the result of a jurisdictional process, where they have been convicted. Capital Punishment is not the problem.
Then you should read it. I specifically said death penalty. There are no honest implications besides punishment as conviction for their crime.
It's genuinely difficult to follow conversations this deeply because of all the comments and the separate chains they make. I don't have an easy parent comment that I can check in Reddit all the way to the top. I just presents me with the top level thread.
I think you did say that in one of your top comments, which is why I didn't remove it.
You are allowed to advocate for the death penalty so long as no one's being crazy about it, and you're not basically advocating for roving death squads.