You're describing very large areas where the different peoples congregate into mostly homogeneous ethno states or enclaves. Most of the conflicts follow lines of difference. The most common are by race and religion, but congregation of like minded people, or conflict between them, is also by language, philosophy, traditions, practices, governance, and other more subtle views. Why do you think you disproved what I quoted with what you said? You need to expand.
You're right, there has never been a "perfect" homogeneous state, where every single constituent is exactly the same as everyone else. Only a massive retard or disingenuous liar would make such an argument, because such a state is impossible to achieve. Almost the entirety of human history consisted of peoples congregating with like minded similar people and forming their own communities and nations. This isn't just along racial bounds. The more alike the people are/were in a nation, the less internal strife and generally the more successful it is/was. Success is also determined by other factors, however. In any case, heterogeneity breeds nothing but social strife, civil war, slavery, social tiers, unequal treatment and results, fracturing, and destruction.
Hasn't that been one of the driving factors for many wars throughout history, lines of difference? Where has difference among the peoples improved anything? Food recipes and music? Trade that crap across borders. You don't need open borders and mass immigration for food recipes. I don't need Juan and a 100 million of his cousins for fucking tacos.
Look at even at the small scale. How can forums (like this place or Reddit) operate without homogeneity? Do you expect all forums to be huge blobs of differing peoples, interests, theories, questions, hobbies, and information without definition or direction, where it's one giant cluster fuck where it's impossible for anyone with similar interests to group up and interact in any meaningful way? How do forums with a modicum of intelligence operate? They separate themselves into homogeneous enclaves where people have similar interests. How about sports? According to your own idiotic logic, isn't delineation of sports bigoted and racist? How dare soccer player prefer to play their own games on their own fields. For soccer to survive, they must allow basketball, baseball, and football players and fans! Applying globalist logic to anything else is rightfully mocked, it's just that NPCs have been indoctrinated to accept the current narrative since birth with 24/7 propaganda. Heterogeneity isn't natural. How about nature itself? Want to know what happens when you force a whole bunch of different species to live together in a small area usually meant for a single herd/species? Violence. Competition for resources and with each other. Nature is violent enough already. There's no need to add to it. Nature itself is "racist" according to your own logic, and yet you insist you're smarter than millions of years of evolution (or creation). People that are that stupid deserve the just rewards that nature gives to such incompetence: a Darwin award. The problem is that society has too many barriers to protect such blatant idiocy, which has allowed it to propagate.
The other problem is liars. You're not arguing upon the merits of heterogeneous societies purely because you think that. You, and the globalists, are arguing for it purely upon white people. The institutions that govern our lives have been infiltrated, subverted, and corrupted, and have become harmful to the very people they're meant to represent and protect. Globalists have discussed the Kalergi plan for over 100 years. They want to replace white people in their own countries through open borders and mass immigration. It's why they gleefully track the decline of the white population. Other races are easier to control and vote for the policies the globalists want. White people are pretty much the only ones that don't want this. It's why we're actively being denied the same rights and liberties granted to other races. The right to congregate with like minded similar people. The right to form our own communities. The right to protect our homes and communities. The right to control who enters. The right to espouse and vote for our own interests. The right to exist unmolested by evil people. The right to raise, teach, and protect our own children. The right to help and protect our own people. All of this is being denied from every institution that the globalists have taken over. Their arguments are hypocritical and logically unsound, and what they're doing is evil. Fuck them, and fuck everyone that supports it, including you.
2.) Anyone that unironically uses the term "stormcuck" proves how pozzed they are and don't belong here.
3.) All of human history has followed the rules of congregation of people along homogeneous lines. It's up to you to prove heterogeneous is better, not for me to prove the natural course of all life, including human behavior.
4.) Deport would be the kindest solution, but it's not the only one. The longer this goes on, the more animosity will prevail.
You're describing very large areas where the different peoples congregate into mostly homogeneous ethno states or enclaves. Most of the conflicts follow lines of difference. The most common are by race and religion, but congregation of like minded people, or conflict between them, is also by language, philosophy, traditions, practices, governance, and other more subtle views. Why do you think you disproved what I quoted with what you said? You need to expand.
Because there has never been a place like that. And all the places one would normally call "homogeneous" is not.
You're right, there has never been a "perfect" homogeneous state, where every single constituent is exactly the same as everyone else. Only a massive retard or disingenuous liar would make such an argument, because such a state is impossible to achieve. Almost the entirety of human history consisted of peoples congregating with like minded similar people and forming their own communities and nations. This isn't just along racial bounds. The more alike the people are/were in a nation, the less internal strife and generally the more successful it is/was. Success is also determined by other factors, however. In any case, heterogeneity breeds nothing but social strife, civil war, slavery, social tiers, unequal treatment and results, fracturing, and destruction.
Hasn't that been one of the driving factors for many wars throughout history, lines of difference? Where has difference among the peoples improved anything? Food recipes and music? Trade that crap across borders. You don't need open borders and mass immigration for food recipes. I don't need Juan and a 100 million of his cousins for fucking tacos.
Look at even at the small scale. How can forums (like this place or Reddit) operate without homogeneity? Do you expect all forums to be huge blobs of differing peoples, interests, theories, questions, hobbies, and information without definition or direction, where it's one giant cluster fuck where it's impossible for anyone with similar interests to group up and interact in any meaningful way? How do forums with a modicum of intelligence operate? They separate themselves into homogeneous enclaves where people have similar interests. How about sports? According to your own idiotic logic, isn't delineation of sports bigoted and racist? How dare soccer player prefer to play their own games on their own fields. For soccer to survive, they must allow basketball, baseball, and football players and fans! Applying globalist logic to anything else is rightfully mocked, it's just that NPCs have been indoctrinated to accept the current narrative since birth with 24/7 propaganda. Heterogeneity isn't natural. How about nature itself? Want to know what happens when you force a whole bunch of different species to live together in a small area usually meant for a single herd/species? Violence. Competition for resources and with each other. Nature is violent enough already. There's no need to add to it. Nature itself is "racist" according to your own logic, and yet you insist you're smarter than millions of years of evolution (or creation). People that are that stupid deserve the just rewards that nature gives to such incompetence: a Darwin award. The problem is that society has too many barriers to protect such blatant idiocy, which has allowed it to propagate.
The other problem is liars. You're not arguing upon the merits of heterogeneous societies purely because you think that. You, and the globalists, are arguing for it purely upon white people. The institutions that govern our lives have been infiltrated, subverted, and corrupted, and have become harmful to the very people they're meant to represent and protect. Globalists have discussed the Kalergi plan for over 100 years. They want to replace white people in their own countries through open borders and mass immigration. It's why they gleefully track the decline of the white population. Other races are easier to control and vote for the policies the globalists want. White people are pretty much the only ones that don't want this. It's why we're actively being denied the same rights and liberties granted to other races. The right to congregate with like minded similar people. The right to form our own communities. The right to protect our homes and communities. The right to control who enters. The right to espouse and vote for our own interests. The right to exist unmolested by evil people. The right to raise, teach, and protect our own children. The right to help and protect our own people. All of this is being denied from every institution that the globalists have taken over. Their arguments are hypocritical and logically unsound, and what they're doing is evil. Fuck them, and fuck everyone that supports it, including you.
Don't confuse small communities, clans, hobby places as a homogenous society example. And even then you will find differences.
Biggest example is this group, with a lot of stormcucks who can't even agree that some stormcucks don't consider slavs white, while others do.
No example of what you advocate has worked. Do you want to separate that society by race or ideas?
What do you plan on doing it, against me, or anyone else that doesn't support your idea?
1.) The same rule applies to all scales.
2.) Anyone that unironically uses the term "stormcuck" proves how pozzed they are and don't belong here.
3.) All of human history has followed the rules of congregation of people along homogeneous lines. It's up to you to prove heterogeneous is better, not for me to prove the natural course of all life, including human behavior.
4.) Deport would be the kindest solution, but it's not the only one. The longer this goes on, the more animosity will prevail.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Not a hoax, just his interpretation.