Johnson died about 12 hours after having a scheduled cesarean section that was performed in 17 minutes
even the head of (obstetrics) here, the head of labor and delivery, looked at it and said 'No, I've never seen one done that fast.'''
Well then the head of obstetrics is lying, because 17 minutes is right in line with how long c sections take. Unless that's including suture time, which takes much longer, in which case I doubt that number to begin with. C sections are very fast. What's slow is stitching all the individual layers back up. That takes a solid half hour. So even if we're to believe the surgeon sliced her open using Blade Mode and extracted the baby in an instant, it'd mean he then sutured at double speed. So this claim makes no sense either way.
Also...
She died from internal bleeding — nearly 90% of her blood was later found in her stomach, Rowley said. Her bladder had been lacerated and she hadn't been sutured properly.
I don't even know what to make of this claim. 90% of her blood? She'd have died long, long before she managed to hemorrhage 90% of her blood into her stomach. Generally speaking, anywhere near 50% is a death sentence. 90% is unheard of, because it's physically impossible to still be alive at that point.
Furthermore, how did the blood get into her stomach? Her bladder was lacerated? If her bladder was emptying into her stomach, she had much bigger problems than a bad c section. Physiologically this makes no sense.
This all reminds me of the claim that George Floyd's spinal cord was severed in multiple places. It's obvious bullshit, but they had the family say it so they could print it and then just say "well it was the family said it, not an expert, so no harm no foul right?"
Well then the head of obstetrics is lying, because 17 minutes is right in line with how long c sections take. Unless that's including suture time, which takes much longer, in which case I doubt that number to begin with. C sections are very fast. What's slow is stitching all the individual layers back up. That takes a solid half hour. So even if we're to believe the surgeon sliced her open using Blade Mode and extracted the baby in an instant, it'd mean he then sutured at double speed. So this claim makes no sense either way.
Also...
I don't even know what to make of this claim. 90% of her blood? She'd have died long, long before she managed to hemorrhage 90% of her blood into her stomach. Generally speaking, anywhere near 50% is a death sentence. 90% is unheard of, because it's physically impossible to still be alive at that point.
Furthermore, how did the blood get into her stomach? Her bladder was lacerated? If her bladder was emptying into her stomach, she had much bigger problems than a bad c section. Physiologically this makes no sense.
This all reminds me of the claim that George Floyd's spinal cord was severed in multiple places. It's obvious bullshit, but they had the family say it so they could print it and then just say "well it was the family said it, not an expert, so no harm no foul right?"