A ‘seizure’ of property requires ‘some meaningful interference [by the government,] with an individual’s possessory interests in [his] property.’
Apparently the government doesn't think disposal of property is included in you "possessory interest". Which is complete bullshit of course.
The fact that this guy was a pedo is a red herring. It's always "combatting drug dealers, terrorists, pedos, etc." that is used to justify eviscerating the Constitution.
Apparently the government doesn't think disposal of property is included in you "possessory interest". Which is complete bullshit of course.
The fact that this guy was a pedo is a red herring. It's always "combatting drug dealers, terrorists, pedos, etc." that is used to justify eviscerating the Constitution.
yup aceptable targets that will trigger emotional thinking