I rather doubt it but I was wondering what other people thought of this question. I doubt it because of how well they have done for the last several hundred years but I also think that that could be because of normalcy bias on my part. And just so we are clear, in my view there is no fate too horrible for those people.
If they have been able to hide their true wealth I'm not sure how they could hide it all, maybe decent portions of it but I don't know how they could hide significant portions. If anything they would probably have found a way to hide it in plain sight.
Thoughts please.
No. That was decided in 2008 when in response to a shamefully poor performance on the part of the big banks, they were rewarded for this with taxpayer money rather than being broken into smaller banks that could be permitted to collapse.
That was the moment when it was decided that the US government would sacrifice the livelihoods of the population to prop up the banks.