We all basically acknowledge that, but it's good to get some minimums for our analysis.
High-ranking officials doesn't tell us much. If anything, killing high ranking officials could potentially keep over-all losses down as it would cause the attacking force to halt and re-organize. It could be prone to attack and harassment, but a harrying attack is not going to generate more losses than a proper offensive will.
jester is literally reading the ukr propoganda. its so obvious, and so hilarious. because even with his 'reputation' around here, and calling everyone stormcucks, he would be supporting the natsoc party if cnn told him to ahaa
massive number of Russian vehicles getting repurposed
roflkek, he's literally reading pravda, hahaha
Russian-troops-loot-gas-station
holy shit finally jester linked something on par with bushs war crimes
Unfortunately this means that deaths are much higher due to the limited scope of how the information is gathered. It could be much more.
Especially with the amount of high ranking officials dying. That is never a good sign.
We all basically acknowledge that, but it's good to get some minimums for our analysis.
High-ranking officials doesn't tell us much. If anything, killing high ranking officials could potentially keep over-all losses down as it would cause the attacking force to halt and re-organize. It could be prone to attack and harassment, but a harrying attack is not going to generate more losses than a proper offensive will.
jester is literally reading the ukr propoganda. its so obvious, and so hilarious. because even with his 'reputation' around here, and calling everyone stormcucks, he would be supporting the natsoc party if cnn told him to ahaa
roflkek, he's literally reading pravda, hahaha
holy shit finally jester linked something on par with bushs war crimes