Caliornia. Lesbians wanted fertility treatments, the law said they didn't have to provide it. They took it to court, court said religious exemption was okay. It's been used by pharmacists to deny medicines, not just the pill and not just in California.
Do you have any information on those court cases? California especially doesn't seem like one that would rule in favor of religious freedom over lesbians.
I don't see the logic of the OP. How would doctors having free speech create denial of treatment based on religious grounds?
Free Speech is the grounds of religious exemptions.
Yeah, I get that (that’s really broad) but where has that been used to deny treatment?
Caliornia. Lesbians wanted fertility treatments, the law said they didn't have to provide it. They took it to court, court said religious exemption was okay. It's been used by pharmacists to deny medicines, not just the pill and not just in California.
Do you have any information on those court cases? California especially doesn't seem like one that would rule in favor of religious freedom over lesbians.