Archive for safe keeping:

https://archive.is/dpQ9

You can't trust a university not to purge this kind of information, which is a sad indictment of the times we live in.

That said, I've always been suspicious of the idea that the homosexuals are some kind of saintly class and the "real" trannies while only the heterosexuals are dirty fetishists. I've seen comments expressing similar sentiments on various "problematic" boards. The homosexual troons' insistence on trapping and other predatory behavior has to be part of a fetish akin to autoerotic asphyxia. Why else would they knowingly invite their extermination like that? The only thing that motivates these freaks is perversion, so I find the claim that the homosexual troons are somehow exempt from this unconvincing.

...it will be useful to keep in mind that autogynephilia seems to be a type of paraphilia. Paraphilias comprise a set of unusual sexual preferences that include autogynephilia, masochism, sadism, exhibitionism (i.e., exposing one's genitals to strangers for sexual excitement), frotteurism (rubbing oneself against strangers, such as in a crowded bus, for sexual excitement), necrophilia, bestiality, and pedophilia.

Yes. All of this. I (and many others inside and outside this community) have been saying this all along. No one has one degenerate fetish. Multiple degenerate fetishes come in the same package. If you have one you have them all. That's why the first 3 words in the phrase "pedophile dog fucking tranny" are redundant.

He has little patience for arguments about whether research is good for people (such as "Are homosexual people hurt or harmed by research on the genetics of sexual orientation?"), preferring instead to dwell on whether scientific findings are true.

An actual scientist? No wonder his results track with observable reality.

There's a long section where the author goes to great pains to describe Michael Jackson without mentioning his name.