I will not fight in any war that doesn't draft women too, unless the enemy is a feminist state and we are liberating it from that sick ideology.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Declarations of war.
Do you really think the feminist enemy, who (and I quote the founder of gender studies here) believe "the male population should be reduced to 10%" wouldn't try starting a land war over some nothing territory to get more men killed?
It won't affect them, we're the ones dying.
I think we need more wars. Wars where we could potentially lose and lose big. Looking back on society, it seems to me that the best societies were warring societies and the worst societies were peaceful ones. When the stakes are high, a lot of the clown world stuff going on would never be allowed to go on. We just need to ensure the right people are at risk of losing the war. Not the frontline soldiers but the rich and powerful people in society that have the power to change things. Once they are at risk because of war, I think things would improve. Also, as more people die from wars, a woman's use in society quickly becomes children and children only, while men get valued higher than women in the sense that men are needed to fight to win the war which is a huge boost to men. And BTW having less men actually works to men's advantage. Supply/demand. With less men, the men who are left are worth considerably more as men thus they are more likely to get a better outcome for themselves. Arguably, our civilization as a species have evolved to always have a deficit of men. I do believe that is ideal. Wars strengthen us and peace makes us weak.
Women in the draft can work in a society like the USA where no real risk exists to the nation. In a true total war scenario, the draft for women would be rescinded to force women to have children to replenish the population.