While I share the assumption that social media is bad by default, it's impossible to know from the outside how much of social media's evil was deliberately fostered by bad actors (Google/Facebook/Twitter/Reddit).
It's entirely possible that an organic or non-evil leadership would have cultivated different results.
While I share the assumption that social media is bad by default, it's impossible to know from the outside how much of social media's evil was deliberately fostered by bad actors (Google/Facebook/Twitter/Reddit).
It's entirely possible that an organic or non-evil leadership would have cultivated different results.
its becoming more clear that jack was the lesser of multiplied evils.
I have no doubt that's the case