The real red pill is to understand women are only ever into guys based on what they think they can get from him. They aren't truly ever seriously into "you", ever.
Ironically, in my experience, you're more likely to get a fairer arrangement from a young whore who knows the bargain and is willing to make the exchange with you. You provide money she provides comfort than you are with a woman your age that claims to be interested in building a family and being your reciprocal. The girls who say they offer the latter are usually far more deceptive than the ones who offer the former.
I think that's why stuff like MGTOW and Bluepill exist in the first place. The bluepill guys are the ones who fall for the unfair exchange and the MGTOW are the guys who refuse to even take the chance, usually because they got screwed over.
I do like the frame of view you use regarding the two sexes. I'll have to consider that more. Might be a decent way to explain differences to people.
Where I think it's weak though is on the whole "men provide", aspect. If women work just as hard as men and earn just as much (as many do), then what do men provide for women? Not much at all. It's clear that women don't provide what men want. A 35yo PhD female with a 8-6pm job with high stress offers men absolutely nothing that men want. On the other hand she likely earns more than most men so most men can't provide her what she supposedly wants. And if we pretend men/women are equal such that their wants/needs can flip so a woman just wants comfort and a man wants her to provide; it still doesn't work because men make enough for themselves and would see the effort woman would want of them to provide "comfort" is too much since they already earn enough to provide resources which should be enough.
The FAGTOW pill unfairly demonizes the transactional nature of all relationships, or likes to pretend that they themselves are not transactional when they are.
I can't think of a single transaction where one party is rewarded for pulling out of the deal after getting what they wanted.
If I don't pay my Xbox Game Pass, they cancel it - I don't get to keep claiming it for free because I'm used to having it. The relationship system is fundamentally flawed and if you put it in the context of a dealing between someone and a major corporation, it's obvious.
You read these stories about how women are evil and are purely transactional, but then you read that they left their wives after they gained weight, stopped having sex with them, etc.
The difference being, they just left - they didn't come back for half the wife's earthly possessions plus 50% of her wages over the next few years.
The real red pill is to understand women are only ever into guys based on what they think they can get from him. They aren't truly ever seriously into "you", ever.
Ironically, in my experience, you're more likely to get a fairer arrangement from a young whore who knows the bargain and is willing to make the exchange with you. You provide money she provides comfort than you are with a woman your age that claims to be interested in building a family and being your reciprocal. The girls who say they offer the latter are usually far more deceptive than the ones who offer the former.
I think that's why stuff like MGTOW and Bluepill exist in the first place. The bluepill guys are the ones who fall for the unfair exchange and the MGTOW are the guys who refuse to even take the chance, usually because they got screwed over.
I do like the frame of view you use regarding the two sexes. I'll have to consider that more. Might be a decent way to explain differences to people.
Don't hate us because we aren't stupid enough to fall for the provider meme.
Cool, I like your take.
Where I think it's weak though is on the whole "men provide", aspect. If women work just as hard as men and earn just as much (as many do), then what do men provide for women? Not much at all. It's clear that women don't provide what men want. A 35yo PhD female with a 8-6pm job with high stress offers men absolutely nothing that men want. On the other hand she likely earns more than most men so most men can't provide her what she supposedly wants. And if we pretend men/women are equal such that their wants/needs can flip so a woman just wants comfort and a man wants her to provide; it still doesn't work because men make enough for themselves and would see the effort woman would want of them to provide "comfort" is too much since they already earn enough to provide resources which should be enough.
How do we fix this as a society?
I can't think of a single transaction where one party is rewarded for pulling out of the deal after getting what they wanted.
If I don't pay my Xbox Game Pass, they cancel it - I don't get to keep claiming it for free because I'm used to having it. The relationship system is fundamentally flawed and if you put it in the context of a dealing between someone and a major corporation, it's obvious.
The difference being, they just left - they didn't come back for half the wife's earthly possessions plus 50% of her wages over the next few years.