Neither can do anything about Marxists. Trads tend to be the MGTOW of the right and leave society for some rural area where it's safe FOR NOW but won't be forever, send their kids to public school due to needing 2 incomes to live these days and buy into or don't call out globalist nonsense at their PTA meetings (IF they even go to them) or churches. Stormfags lack the intelligence to realize whites make up 1% of the world so having a stupid race war would exterminate whites REALLY quickly, they have zero support from the genpop no matter the race and they tend to purity spiral into what white is (Italians, Slavic, Asians and Greek debates) which is navel gazing at this point and serves no purpose.....Not to mention the fact that both sides mock each other, even though they're 99% in agreement but they'd rather sling mud and throw shade than band together and accomplish something aka the apes stronger together logic.
Trads [...] send their kids to public school due to needing 2 incomes to live these days and buy into or don't call out globalist nonsense at their PTA meetings (IF they even go to them) or churches.
That doesn't describe trads, it describes normies. The whole bit about White Nationalists still isn't relevant (even if it's true) because at no point in this comment chain have I or anyone else advocated for White Nationalism as an ideology that can defeat Marxism. I appreciate that you attempted to answer the original question, but I think it's a leap to expect because I suggest that Traditionalism is incapable of defeating Marxism, that I will then propose that White Nationalism can defeat Marxism.
I was replying to both you and 1234. HE mentioned stormcucks aka White Nationalists....Oh, forgot 1 other point. Both Trads and Storms have a SERIOUS issue with grifters and charlatans in their ranks i.e Jack Cucky and Matt Hambeast.
OK, but he didn't say Stormers were the solution either. I guess I'm mostly annoyed that people are bringing up irrelevant non-solutions instead of either A) defending the proposed solution of Traditionalism or B) suggesting an alternative solution. Maybe I should have made it explicit that I wanted to argue what the actual solution is, rather than just being a naysayer.
You didn't address the question, you just pulled out a red herring that's disintegrated from overuse.
Neither can do anything about Marxists. Trads tend to be the MGTOW of the right and leave society for some rural area where it's safe FOR NOW but won't be forever, send their kids to public school due to needing 2 incomes to live these days and buy into or don't call out globalist nonsense at their PTA meetings (IF they even go to them) or churches. Stormfags lack the intelligence to realize whites make up 1% of the world so having a stupid race war would exterminate whites REALLY quickly, they have zero support from the genpop no matter the race and they tend to purity spiral into what white is (Italians, Slavic, Asians and Greek debates) which is navel gazing at this point and serves no purpose.....Not to mention the fact that both sides mock each other, even though they're 99% in agreement but they'd rather sling mud and throw shade than band together and accomplish something aka the apes stronger together logic.
That doesn't describe trads, it describes normies. The whole bit about White Nationalists still isn't relevant (even if it's true) because at no point in this comment chain have I or anyone else advocated for White Nationalism as an ideology that can defeat Marxism. I appreciate that you attempted to answer the original question, but I think it's a leap to expect because I suggest that Traditionalism is incapable of defeating Marxism, that I will then propose that White Nationalism can defeat Marxism.
I was replying to both you and 1234. HE mentioned stormcucks aka White Nationalists....Oh, forgot 1 other point. Both Trads and Storms have a SERIOUS issue with grifters and charlatans in their ranks i.e Jack Cucky and Matt Hambeast.
OK, but he didn't say Stormers were the solution either. I guess I'm mostly annoyed that people are bringing up irrelevant non-solutions instead of either A) defending the proposed solution of Traditionalism or B) suggesting an alternative solution. Maybe I should have made it explicit that I wanted to argue what the actual solution is, rather than just being a naysayer.