Well they haven't ruled on any federal vaccine mandate cases yet.
They have ruled in favor of state mandates so far so you are technically correct that they have established themselves as pro-mandate but so far only when it comes to state imposed mandates.
Could be set up for "we are anti mandate, but pro vax'.
Or just the media pressing for irrelevant information.
They’ve already established themselves as pro mandate
Well they haven't ruled on any federal vaccine mandate cases yet.
They have ruled in favor of state mandates so far so you are technically correct that they have established themselves as pro-mandate but so far only when it comes to state imposed mandates.
I hope this is what this whole announcement is about.