3 for and 3 against by rote, leaving 3 unknowns: Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Prediction is:
Kavanaugh against due to federalism concerns
Roberts against due to unmerited Commerce Clause expansion
Barrett against because of peer pressure (>_>)
Oral arguments will be telling because the side that gets the most questions is the side that tends to lose (Judges will pre-decide and shoot holes in the side they oppose with their questioning). Those will take place this week.
Many other interesting details that warrant watching the clip. The status of litigation nationwide. The comparison to Canadian litigation which has utterly failed in all respects because judges there are rubberstamping the zeitgeist without consideration. Biden himself declaring mandates are a state issue (though since he is recognizably insane, his statements may not carry so much weight in adult conversation). And other stuff.
Cliff notes?
3 for and 3 against by rote, leaving 3 unknowns: Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Prediction is:
Oral arguments will be telling because the side that gets the most questions is the side that tends to lose (Judges will pre-decide and shoot holes in the side they oppose with their questioning). Those will take place this week.
Many other interesting details that warrant watching the clip. The status of litigation nationwide. The comparison to Canadian litigation which has utterly failed in all respects because judges there are rubberstamping the zeitgeist without consideration. Biden himself declaring mandates are a state issue (though since he is recognizably insane, his statements may not carry so much weight in adult conversation). And other stuff.
Thanks man. I'll give it a listen after work.
Alito will likely vote no if the other cons do so as well and Thomas I'd like to think would vote no as well but I'm not 100% on that.