I disagree with Dr Peterson on this (can’t be right all of the time) there is plenty of reasons to wish to be anonymous. Example Andy Ngo uses his real name and gets hunted and attacked by far left losers and all he does is shows what they are doing in public. If you are attacked for just showing an event as it happens that’s reason enough to wish to stay anonymous. And the most vicious individuals on Twitter use their real name and photo. Or look at authors who use a pen name over their real names on books they right. Some could be silly like JK Rowling thinking boys would not want to read a book if they thought it was written by a woman. Or you just don’t want the celebrity status once something you said gets popular. So no Dr Peterson, the ability to stay anonymous online is a safety feature not a shield to be awful, because again there are plenty of awful people on Twitter who use their real name.
I disagree with Dr Peterson on this (can’t be right all of the time) there is plenty of reasons to wish to be anonymous. Example Andy Ngo uses his real name and gets hunted and attacked by far left losers and all he does is shows what they are doing in public. If you are attacked for just showing an event as it happens that’s reason enough to wish to stay anonymous. And the most vicious individuals on Twitter use their real name and photo. Or look at authors who use a pen name over their real names on books they right. Some could be silly like JK Rowling thinking boys would not want to read a book if they thought it was written by a woman. Or you just don’t want the celebrity status once something you said gets popular. So no Dr Peterson, the ability to stay anonymous online is a safety feature not a shield to be awful, because again there are plenty of awful people on Twitter who use their real name.