It seems like you're saying you're Polish? I'm admittedly not that well versed in Eastern European politics, but my 'general admiration' for what I presumed to be an anti-EU sentiment in Poland was destroyed when Poland joined in on the attack on Belarus.
I don't believe Poland should be nuked for the attack on Belarus, and attempted assassination attempt, but all the so-called leaders of Poland should be killed. It was a really unfortunate way to come out as a criminal country.
Also there are persistent rumors that the KGB is training and arming the invaders with lethal weapons. But so far they only received and uses non-lethals like tear gas and stun grenades. Other than that they simply throw rocks and stuff like that. So no shooting.
There was never any "attack on Belarus". Our soldiers have strict orders to not shoot unless being actually shot at, and even that not on their own initiative. And civilians can't even move freely around in the emergency zone (not even the remaining locals), that's mostly as to not let anyone help the invaders but anyway.
There were actual firefights with the Czechoslovak border guards just after WWII. Still not "attack on", just skirmishes.
Directly above the "People also ask" section. There's an expanded section of meanings and definitions for the word 'attack'. Several of those match the actions of Poland, vis-à-vis the 'actions' committed against Belarus by the EU and associates at the behest of 'them'.
It seems like you're saying you're Polish? I'm admittedly not that well versed in Eastern European politics, but my 'general admiration' for what I presumed to be an anti-EU sentiment in Poland was destroyed when Poland joined in on the attack on Belarus.
I don't believe Poland should be nuked for the attack on Belarus, and attempted assassination attempt, but all the so-called leaders of Poland should be killed. It was a really unfortunate way to come out as a criminal country.
Also there are persistent rumors that the KGB is training and arming the invaders with lethal weapons. But so far they only received and uses non-lethals like tear gas and stun grenades. Other than that they simply throw rocks and stuff like that. So no shooting.
(Besides a soldier who shot himself.)
There was never any "attack on Belarus". Our soldiers have strict orders to not shoot unless being actually shot at, and even that not on their own initiative. And civilians can't even move freely around in the emergency zone (not even the remaining locals), that's mostly as to not let anyone help the invaders but anyway.
There were actual firefights with the Czechoslovak border guards just after WWII. Still not "attack on", just skirmishes.
Click on 'Translations and more definitions'.
Excuse me?
https://www.google.com/search?q=attack
Directly above the "People also ask" section. There's an expanded section of meanings and definitions for the word 'attack'. Several of those match the actions of Poland, vis-à-vis the 'actions' committed against Belarus by the EU and associates at the behest of 'them'.