If anything, the conclusions from this study likely contradict most of our impressions of the side effects associated with the injections.
The issue with these studies is that they're based on data reported by people who may be incentivized against accuracy or who seem to have a political conflict of interest against "anti-vaxxers". I mean, this study suggests you have a decreased risk of pericarditis following injection. How is that remotely possible? I read that and thought the only way is if incidence data is underreported... which means all conclusions from this study are bogus.
If anything, the conclusions from this study likely contradict most of our impressions of the side effects associated with the injections.
The issue with these studies is that they're based on data reported by people who may be incentivized against accuracy or who seem to have a political conflict of interest against "anti-vaxxers". I mean, this study suggests you have a decreased risk of pericarditis following injection. How is that remotely possible? I read that and thought the only way is if incidence data is underreported... which means all conclusions from this study are bogus.