Rowling is endorsing an article that says logging rapists as women is absurd.
the implication is that saying a woman can rape is absurd, because it doesn't align with the now canon definition of rape - which excludes women from being able to commit rape.
Rowling is endorsing an article that says logging rapists as women is absurd.
the implication is that saying a woman can rape is absurd, because it doesn't align with the now canon definition of rape - which excludes women from being able to commit rape.
yes. very based.