Wanting to "preserve whiteness" is racist. So is wanting to "preserve blackness". I don't care if "whiteness" or "blackness" is in danger of being destroyed. I care about whether or not people are actively targeting members of these groups for discrimination, public humiliation, and violence.
As of right now, the Left is hurling all of that against white people.
No it isn't. Whiteness is simply a large, abstract, political category that erases the nuances between smaller ethnic groups that have little in common.
"Whiteness" was never a good idea. It was an invention by racialists who were already failures as individuals to parasitize the success of other people of which they had almost nothing in common. No Ukrainian can take credit for the success of building a French Cathedral. The Protestant Work Ethic does not exist in Greece.
To add into that, there are plenty of bad things about each of these smaller ethnic and national identities that are both good and bad, that perhaps should not be shared to other societies, like most French philosophy, or the Italian work ethic, or English supremacism and arrogance, or German Intellectual zealotry.
"Whiteness" is a political effort to gloss over the differences of different groups, but instead of fostering a proper civic national identity: like American, which at least shares a culture, a language, a history, a geography, and more; the racialists just dump every single european population and all their histories into a large amorphous gray lump.
Whiteness is a progressive, universalist, globo-homo, pet project that was abandoned a few decades ago by mainstream progressives; only to be re-introduced as "White Affinity", so that it can be a punching back for other progressive, universalist, globo-homo, pet projects. The purpose for all of these identities is to unite them under Socialism as they have done with "Blackness".
What the progressives did to Africa is what they also did under the guise of "Nationalism" in the Progressive Era in Europe. "Blackness" and "Pan-Africanism" and "The African Diaspora" is just another racial pet project that is attempting to unify vastly different peoples under racial socialism, and it managed to cause one of the bloodiest wars in the 20th century that killed nearly a million people and spanned a whole continent, because Leftists actively refuse to learn. When even the leader of Ethiopia's Derg realizes: "Holy shit, Leftism made everything worse and killed everyone" and then renounces Marxism as a failure, it really should tell you all you need to know about how impervious to feedback Leftist really are.
Wanting to preserve blackness means moving away from the marxists
That's a complete fucking lie, and you know it. Blackness is designed to be a Leftist identity. That's it's purpose. It is an extention of Pan-Africanism, and it's why BLM is filled to the fucking brim with revolutionary communists. It's why Black National Socialists basically identify Whiteness, Capitalism, and Judaism all under the same banner. You might not want to accept it, but they see Jews as just another form of White, and Capitalism as an extension of the same.
This is because they are all National Socialists, and National Socialists are Socialists first and foremost, forever.
Racialism is a Leftist construct, and it will always put Leftism ahead of everything else. Blackness / Pan-Africanism, can't exist without Leftism. If Leftism dies, Blackness goes with it.
You can't attack Blackness nor Whiteness without attacking Leftism because both are Leftist out-growths. Same way you can't attack Feminism without attacking Leftism.
Leftists are white. Vast majority of them. Whiteness is an outgrowth of Leftism.
WHITES DESERVE TO SURVIVE.
Whites are just white people. Whiteness is an ideology.
Doesn't matter, if the Ukranians and French were willing to rise up and fight communists I'd proudly fight beside them. No more brother wars. No more purity spiralling. No more "Hurr durr slavics aren't white enough".
"Brothers", shut up. Europeans aren't brothers, they're not families, they're just people who reside on the same continent. You're basically taking Pan-Africanism and applying it to Europe. You might as well call Africa a "Black Continent" despite all evidence to the contrary. You've created a political abstraction that is nothing more than a globo homo identity turned into euro homo.
And even then, you'll have to recognize that both the French and Ukraninans, and a whole slew of other white populations are avid Leftists. France is where the damn term comes from.
You can't eradicate Leftism without attacking whites, so if your purpose is to support whites, you have no choice but to support Leftists.
Unless, of course, you're just another racialist who's a race traitor, because you'll always abandon "your people" if they don't meet your expectations.
If the left wants you dead for your skin tone, you're white.
Okay, so asians and jews are going to be white again?
Wanting to "preserve whiteness" is racist. So is wanting to "preserve blackness". I don't care if "whiteness" or "blackness" is in danger of being destroyed. I care about whether or not people are actively targeting members of these groups for discrimination, public humiliation, and violence.
As of right now, the Left is hurling all of that against white people.
No it isn't. Whiteness is simply a large, abstract, political category that erases the nuances between smaller ethnic groups that have little in common.
"Whiteness" was never a good idea. It was an invention by racialists who were already failures as individuals to parasitize the success of other people of which they had almost nothing in common. No Ukrainian can take credit for the success of building a French Cathedral. The Protestant Work Ethic does not exist in Greece.
To add into that, there are plenty of bad things about each of these smaller ethnic and national identities that are both good and bad, that perhaps should not be shared to other societies, like most French philosophy, or the Italian work ethic, or English supremacism and arrogance, or German Intellectual zealotry.
"Whiteness" is a political effort to gloss over the differences of different groups, but instead of fostering a proper civic national identity: like American, which at least shares a culture, a language, a history, a geography, and more; the racialists just dump every single european population and all their histories into a large amorphous gray lump.
Whiteness is a progressive, universalist, globo-homo, pet project that was abandoned a few decades ago by mainstream progressives; only to be re-introduced as "White Affinity", so that it can be a punching back for other progressive, universalist, globo-homo, pet projects. The purpose for all of these identities is to unite them under Socialism as they have done with "Blackness".
What the progressives did to Africa is what they also did under the guise of "Nationalism" in the Progressive Era in Europe. "Blackness" and "Pan-Africanism" and "The African Diaspora" is just another racial pet project that is attempting to unify vastly different peoples under racial socialism, and it managed to cause one of the bloodiest wars in the 20th century that killed nearly a million people and spanned a whole continent, because Leftists actively refuse to learn. When even the leader of Ethiopia's Derg realizes: "Holy shit, Leftism made everything worse and killed everyone" and then renounces Marxism as a failure, it really should tell you all you need to know about how impervious to feedback Leftist really are.
That's a complete fucking lie, and you know it. Blackness is designed to be a Leftist identity. That's it's purpose. It is an extention of Pan-Africanism, and it's why BLM is filled to the fucking brim with revolutionary communists. It's why Black National Socialists basically identify Whiteness, Capitalism, and Judaism all under the same banner. You might not want to accept it, but they see Jews as just another form of White, and Capitalism as an extension of the same.
This is because they are all National Socialists, and National Socialists are Socialists first and foremost, forever.
Racialism is a Leftist construct, and it will always put Leftism ahead of everything else. Blackness / Pan-Africanism, can't exist without Leftism. If Leftism dies, Blackness goes with it.
You can't attack Blackness nor Whiteness without attacking Leftism because both are Leftist out-growths. Same way you can't attack Feminism without attacking Leftism.
Leftists are white. Vast majority of them. Whiteness is an outgrowth of Leftism.
Whites are just white people. Whiteness is an ideology.
"Brothers", shut up. Europeans aren't brothers, they're not families, they're just people who reside on the same continent. You're basically taking Pan-Africanism and applying it to Europe. You might as well call Africa a "Black Continent" despite all evidence to the contrary. You've created a political abstraction that is nothing more than a globo homo identity turned into euro homo.
And even then, you'll have to recognize that both the French and Ukraninans, and a whole slew of other white populations are avid Leftists. France is where the damn term comes from.
You can't eradicate Leftism without attacking whites, so if your purpose is to support whites, you have no choice but to support Leftists.
Unless, of course, you're just another racialist who's a race traitor, because you'll always abandon "your people" if they don't meet your expectations.
Okay, so asians and jews are going to be white again?