As we now have trans as a protected class it has shown the slippery slope in full free fall from the “gay rights” debate a decade ago. The problem is that laws based on fallacies will always be abused because their is no need to prove that any additions are legitimate. We have known for centuries men and women are not equal, we have known for centuries that racial aggregates depended on the culture dictating genetics. When we pretended that this didn’t matter we opened the door for non-biological protected classes. There has never been any evidence that being gay or trans is genetic, and there has been inconclusive evidence that gay and trans is biological at all aside from the biological impact occurring from grooming. In fact the best biological evidence we have is that external stimuli (aka other people) is what causes biological changes in the individual. Yet now we have more protected classes that are inherently non-biological than provably biological. These abuses are meant to subjugate not protect, they are meant to deny reality in place of accepting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
In point of fact, if the recently disproved theory of evolution was true, there are no circumstances in which being gay ever could be genetic.
Gayness doesn't exist in nature, therefore, it cannot be genetic. Gayness is always a choice.
This isnt true. Apes fuck each other all the time.
Either way argument from nature is 60 IQ anyway so it’s irrelevant
That isn’t homosexuality, if apes were gay they would also not fuck female primates. This is a retarded misnomer of an argument that fags screech because they have no actual evidence of any actual gay animal, just mass animal rape.
Most animal sex is “rape” the point is homosexual sex DOES occur in nature. But so does a lot of awful things so its a retarded argument