Well NASA reports on mean temperature data which shows there has been an increase over the past 140 years of one degree celsius.
Don't worry about the future just look at the past. It has been increasing more quickly recently than it has close to 140 years ago when we started measuring, so it is increasing for sure.
Now, is it going to cause a catastrophe? Probably not. At the current rate, it would take another 60 years or so to get another degree, and one degree isn't going to raise sea level fast enough to do any real damage. If it, for example, raises sea level so that some coastal properties are enveloped - they have 60 years to move, so it's not really that bad.
That said, it is a problem, but it's sort of peaking since human population has started to plateau, and most of the biggest old polluters stopped doing the really destructive stuff back in the 80s (burning crude oil/coal etc). We do need to make changes - but it's not anywhere near the level of critical mass some people are making it out to be.
And prior to the 20th century it's almost exclusively ground temps in the United States and until the late 20th century it was almost exclusively ground temps in the United States and Europe. And it doesn't actually show any significant net warming until it's run through pairwise homogeneity software which removes "bias" which just happens to equal the amount of warming measured over that time period. Odd.
So, check Figure 4, 5 and 6 (page 37). Now notice Figure 6 for the United States temps, which I remind you is the only temps they have long term data for. No net warming. Figure 4 and Figure 5 shows net warming but that data doesn't exist; it's modeled. Now if you look at a newer NASA graph of US temperature it will show the same data with an upward trend added. That's not from measurement; it's from PH. There's literally no net warming that has every been measured; it's all data science voodoo.
The unadjusted data from 1999 shows faster warming from 1880 to 1940 than from 1970 to 1999. Pre-1940 carbon was pretty negligible so what caused the warming? Climate science is a fucking scam. Without adjustments there is no warming; it would be more scientific to believe that CO2 concentration causes the NOAA to adjust temperatures because the measured temp doesn't follow CO2 but the net adjustment to temperature follows it almost perfectly.
Well NASA reports on mean temperature data which shows there has been an increase over the past 140 years of one degree celsius.
Don't worry about the future just look at the past. It has been increasing more quickly recently than it has close to 140 years ago when we started measuring, so it is increasing for sure.
Now, is it going to cause a catastrophe? Probably not. At the current rate, it would take another 60 years or so to get another degree, and one degree isn't going to raise sea level fast enough to do any real damage. If it, for example, raises sea level so that some coastal properties are enveloped - they have 60 years to move, so it's not really that bad.
That said, it is a problem, but it's sort of peaking since human population has started to plateau, and most of the biggest old polluters stopped doing the really destructive stuff back in the 80s (burning crude oil/coal etc). We do need to make changes - but it's not anywhere near the level of critical mass some people are making it out to be.
Dude. NASA has only existed for 63 years. How the fuck have they been tracking temps for 140?
140 years is the amount of time humans have been measuring temperatures on the planet. Nasa has a collection of that data.
And prior to the 20th century it's almost exclusively ground temps in the United States and until the late 20th century it was almost exclusively ground temps in the United States and Europe. And it doesn't actually show any significant net warming until it's run through pairwise homogeneity software which removes "bias" which just happens to equal the amount of warming measured over that time period. Odd.
Oh, shit, look it's NASA https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf
So, check Figure 4, 5 and 6 (page 37). Now notice Figure 6 for the United States temps, which I remind you is the only temps they have long term data for. No net warming. Figure 4 and Figure 5 shows net warming but that data doesn't exist; it's modeled. Now if you look at a newer NASA graph of US temperature it will show the same data with an upward trend added. That's not from measurement; it's from PH. There's literally no net warming that has every been measured; it's all data science voodoo.
The unadjusted data from 1999 shows faster warming from 1880 to 1940 than from 1970 to 1999. Pre-1940 carbon was pretty negligible so what caused the warming? Climate science is a fucking scam. Without adjustments there is no warming; it would be more scientific to believe that CO2 concentration causes the NOAA to adjust temperatures because the measured temp doesn't follow CO2 but the net adjustment to temperature follows it almost perfectly.