It really depends on the wording of the question (I didn't read the article), but there are a lot of things you can say that are true without making their decision easier.
What do you mean by "believe" in the 2nd amendment mean? I guess I don't have a problem with it?
Sorry I haven't read much of the Federalist papers. I know it's one of our founding documents. So yeah I agree with whatever the law says.
I can't say if I'd be partial or impartial. That's for you to decide.
Basically they only want dumb or uneducated people as jurors.
you would. having been through a jury trial myself the DA worked feverishly to cause anybody with a college degree to eliminate themselves and when that failed he used his available exclusions to remove them
It really depends on the wording of the question (I didn't read the article), but there are a lot of things you can say that are true without making their decision easier.
What do you mean by "believe" in the 2nd amendment mean? I guess I don't have a problem with it?
Sorry I haven't read much of the Federalist papers. I know it's one of our founding documents. So yeah I agree with whatever the law says.
I can't say if I'd be partial or impartial. That's for you to decide.
Basically they only want dumb or uneducated people as jurors.
Probably a lot of truth to that. For example, if I was in a jury pool, I'd probably be kicked out during jury selection because I'm in law school.
you would. having been through a jury trial myself the DA worked feverishly to cause anybody with a college degree to eliminate themselves and when that failed he used his available exclusions to remove them