"When will there be enough women on the Supreme Court? When there are nine."
I love this quote. It trashes the notion of equality that they pretend to care about and openly states the true desire for complete domination.
Barrett will always be a mistake. The answer to the RBG empty seat should have been someone who made my views of women look moderate. That would be the equivalent to what she was.
I love this quote. It trashes the notion of equality that they pretend to care about and openly states the true desire for complete domination.
Does this mean that until 1981 when the first wahman was appointed to the SCOTUS, there was 'complete domination' by men? Not to mention all presidents and most legislators?
"When will there be enough women on the Supreme Court? When there are nine."
I love this quote. It trashes the notion of equality that they pretend to care about and openly states the true desire for complete domination.
Barrett will always be a mistake. The answer to the RBG empty seat should have been someone who made my views of women look moderate. That would be the equivalent to what she was.
Does this mean that until 1981 when the first wahman was appointed to the SCOTUS, there was 'complete domination' by men? Not to mention all presidents and most legislators?
You played yourself, man...
I thought it would be pretty obvious.
If an all-female court is 'complete domination' by women, then an all-male court (as was the case until 1981) would be 'complete domination' by men.
Basically SJW claptrap.
It's not symmetric because men (by and large, TheImpossible1 notwithstanding) care about women and women don't care about men.
https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf