Prosecutors are also asking the judge to block any evidence suggesting local police officers provided water to those who responded to calls on social media to take up arms to defend businesses the evening of the shooting and thanked them for showing up to help patrol the streets.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?
I hate this time line so much.
It’s only fair. They denied some requests to provide information that shows what a violent, retarded high school drop out Kyle is. It’s not going to matter anyway. That kid is going away for a long time. Especially with the FBI drone infrared camera recordings they have.
What do the drone cameras show that the phone footage doesn't then? It's not under dispute that Rittenhouse killed two people and badly injured a third, the debate is why, and the existing footage quite clearly shows Rittenhouse being attacked, then chased and attacked again, then some genius trying to cheap-shot him and losing his bicep for it.
Also, you're throwing "FBI" around like it's not an organisation rushing towards it's dream role of the political police. Do you have a more credible source?
Any source I provide, you will try to discredit. So I will meet you back here after the guilty verdict and you can tell me all about how unfair the justice system is against conservatives, despite 86% of law enforcement voting for Trump.
Not any source. The FBI, particularly, has recent form as an organisation involved in what appear to be political prosecutions - or did you miss the whole Whitmer thing where it's seemingly the FBI doing the heavy lifting?
Or is this you not liking being asked to actually show your working rather than merely your rhetoric?