That's like saying "Ovens exist today and sometime in the future, people will be shoved in them. So we must defend ourselves against the ovens." in 2300 B.C. Something that has been around for a while and is one time utilized in a different manner doesn't mean they were always intended for that or solely for that, or that it will be used for that always afterwards.
He's saying that everything she's predicting here is almost certain to happen at some point, because it's such an obvious potential way to murder millions upon millions of people, but this doesn't mean that every vaccine mandate is a genocide plan.
He's correct, but the flip side of his own statement is "And this could be the one that is a genocide plan."
I don't believe for a second that it is, because it isn't killing or sterilizing enough people, but it IS being exploited by an increasingly authoritarian government.
It's considered that now; however, it sure as hell wasn't back in 2009 — or even 2004 when she first began speaking about it.
You really need to learn your history and find out why coronavirus vaccines have all failed in the past and how long it typically took before the effects really began to display themselves. That's why many people are worried about the long-term effects. Almost no one from the very beginning thought they would just outright exterminate people. Do you even realize how obvious that would be?
What's made the vaccines fail in the past is that they've left people susceptible to viruses found in nature as well as completely immunocompromised. These effects almost never displayed themselves until 2 to 3 years later — not immediately.
That doesn't mean anything bad will even come of this crap now, as I've said before, chances are much higher that this is simply greedy assholes being greedy. That said, if the plan was a depopulation plan — which we unequivocally know that nearly every single liberal elite supports eugenics or depopulation initiatives — they're going to execute it in a way that isn't blindingly obvious, but that plays out over an extended period of time.
Even if they wiped out 90% of the population, that 10% is still way the hell more than enough to wipe them out as revenge.
Hell, the fact that Delta even exists should raise serious concerns. Typically, coronaviruses only mutate into weaker versions as time goes on. Pretty much the only exception to this is when, exactly?
When vaccines are involved.
Hence why we never got an "even more deadly and contagious" variant before the vaccine. These people are seriously playing with fire and better pray that history of failed conronavirus vaccines doesn't repeat — or even more terrifying, some form of Marek's disease.
Either way, to think that it isn't "killing or sterilizing" enough yet may be a bit preemptive, especially when we're looking at boosters every few months and the harm seems to be increasing in a linear fashion statistically.
That's like saying "Ovens exist today and sometime in the future, people will be shoved in them. So we must defend ourselves against the ovens." in 2300 B.C. Something that has been around for a while and is one time utilized in a different manner doesn't mean they were always intended for that or solely for that, or that it will be used for that always afterwards.
I have no idea what you're talking about. That analogy also makes little sense.
He's saying that everything she's predicting here is almost certain to happen at some point, because it's such an obvious potential way to murder millions upon millions of people, but this doesn't mean that every vaccine mandate is a genocide plan.
He's correct, but the flip side of his own statement is "And this could be the one that is a genocide plan."
I don't believe for a second that it is, because it isn't killing or sterilizing enough people, but it IS being exploited by an increasingly authoritarian government.
It's considered that now; however, it sure as hell wasn't back in 2009 — or even 2004 when she first began speaking about it.
You really need to learn your history and find out why coronavirus vaccines have all failed in the past and how long it typically took before the effects really began to display themselves.
That's why many people are worried about the long-term effects. Almost no one from the very beginning thought they would just outright exterminate people. Do you even realize how obvious that would be?
What's made the vaccines fail in the past is that they've left people susceptible to viruses found in nature as well as completely immunocompromised. These effects almost never displayed themselves until 2 to 3 years later — not immediately.
That doesn't mean anything bad will even come of this crap now, as I've said before, chances are much higher that this is simply greedy assholes being greedy. That said, if the plan was a depopulation plan — which we unequivocally know that nearly every single liberal elite supports eugenics or depopulation initiatives — they're going to execute it in a way that isn't blindingly obvious, but that plays out over an extended period of time.
Even if they wiped out 90% of the population, that 10% is still way the hell more than enough to wipe them out as revenge.
Hell, the fact that Delta even exists should raise serious concerns. Typically, coronaviruses only mutate into weaker versions as time goes on. Pretty much the only exception to this is when, exactly?
When vaccines are involved.
Hence why we never got an "even more deadly and contagious" variant before the vaccine. These people are seriously playing with fire and better pray that history of failed conronavirus vaccines doesn't repeat — or even more terrifying, some form of Marek's disease.
Either way, to think that it isn't "killing or sterilizing" enough yet may be a bit preemptive, especially when we're looking at boosters every few months and the harm seems to be increasing in a linear fashion statistically.