What happens when you make it mandatory that unvaccinated people get tested for a virus where the majority of people are asymptomatic, while simultaneously exempting those who've been vaccinated, but who can similarly be infected by, and facilitate the transmission of, the virus, just the same?
Answer: You get a narrative.
Make no mistake. The whole point of this is to reinforce their narrative that people who don't wish to be forced and coerced into participating in a disgusting large-scale pharmaceutical company experiment for a biological agent that we have absolutelyzero conclusive evidence of what the long-term effects may be — which can take years to manifest — are "filthy and diseased vermin."
it will be used against us later in order to enact much stricter measures and isolate us from society.
Let's say, around the time of mid-term elections, perhaps?
Who can't see it happening now?
"If you're not vaccinated, you will not be eligible for voting in person at your local election site. You must participate by mail-in ballot," which, coincidentally enough, will probably never arrive if your party designation doesn't align with what they want.
Go ahead, screenshot this and tuck it away for later. This will happen.
In the end, this isn't about "Health & Safety™" as the so frenetically pretend it to be. The end goal of this is the same exact goal that it always ends up being when it involves Democrats: Power and Control.
This isn't a "prediction" — it's a guarantee.
If people don't start taking this shit much more seriously and realizing that they're not just being petty and vindictive but that there are actual objectives they're attempting to achieve involved as well, then we're seriously screwed.
I'd bet money that, for the majority of people, this thought never even crossed their mind.
Funny thing is that I have a minimal risk solution that I'm around 95% sure will solve this and get rid of mandates for good — which I'm also completely confident about the efficacy of working if the message was spread widely enough. The problem is that I don't have any platform and get the message out and spread it.
In order for it to work, it takes the cooperation of people doing some very simple things — but it would make this go away in no time.
It's exceedingly frustrating to know what to do and be completely helpless to execute it.
Pop Quiz:
What happens when you make it mandatory that unvaccinated people get tested for a virus where the majority of people are asymptomatic, while simultaneously exempting those who've been vaccinated, but who can similarly be infected by, and facilitate the transmission of, the virus, just the same?
Answer: You get a narrative.
Make no mistake. The whole point of this is to reinforce their narrative that people who don't wish to be forced and coerced into participating in a disgusting large-scale pharmaceutical company experiment for a biological agent that we have absolutely zero conclusive evidence of what the long-term effects may be — which can take years to manifest — are "filthy and diseased vermin."
it will be used against us later in order to enact much stricter measures and isolate us from society.
Let's say, around the time of mid-term elections, perhaps?
Who can't see it happening now?
"If you're not vaccinated, you will not be eligible for voting in person at your local election site. You must participate by mail-in ballot," which, coincidentally enough, will probably never arrive if your party designation doesn't align with what they want.
Go ahead, screenshot this and tuck it away for later. This will happen.
In the end, this isn't about "Health & Safety™" as the so frenetically pretend it to be. The end goal of this is the same exact goal that it always ends up being when it involves Democrats: Power and Control.
This isn't a "prediction" — it's a guarantee.
If people don't start taking this shit much more seriously and realizing that they're not just being petty and vindictive but that there are actual objectives they're attempting to achieve involved as well, then we're seriously screwed.
I'd bet money that, for the majority of people, this thought never even crossed their mind.
Funny thing is that I have a minimal risk solution that I'm around 95% sure will solve this and get rid of mandates for good — which I'm also completely confident about the efficacy of working if the message was spread widely enough. The problem is that I don't have any platform and get the message out and spread it.
In order for it to work, it takes the cooperation of people doing some very simple things — but it would make this go away in no time.
It's exceedingly frustrating to know what to do and be completely helpless to execute it.
What is your solution?
it's simple, we - uh - kill the batman.