Studies have shown that if men and women are left to hire whoever they want (without diversity/inclusion nonsense) men will hire men and women will hire women. I think the test cases came out to be 75% male with a male hiring manager and 80% female for a female manager. It’s just because both genders feel more comfortable hiring someone that has more in common with them.
I don’t see anything wrong with that (let them succeed or fail on their own), but again, it has to be fair for both sides. Diversity laws around the world prevent men from making certain teams with their hiring quotas, along with men being constantly demonized in most workplace discussions.
Well, here’s the reality to that statement:
Studies have shown that if men and women are left to hire whoever they want (without diversity/inclusion nonsense) men will hire men and women will hire women. I think the test cases came out to be 75% male with a male hiring manager and 80% female for a female manager. It’s just because both genders feel more comfortable hiring someone that has more in common with them.
I don’t see anything wrong with that (let them succeed or fail on their own), but again, it has to be fair for both sides. Diversity laws around the world prevent men from making certain teams with their hiring quotas, along with men being constantly demonized in most workplace discussions.