So is there actually a problem where women can't walk around in the UK? If there is I presume it's being raped by migrants.
It seems like they are constantly worried about women walking around, but I wonder if it's sort of like gun control narratives in the US where it's a few scattered incidents they make a big deal out of. So all these women think they are constantly in danger and call for "common sense man control."
No, quite the opposite. It's men that are at risk of being killed walking around, either by other men or increasingly likely by women.
The rate of women being murdered has declined in recent times, while the rate of female perpetrators has increased.
It is indeed, and they all have odd occurrences that don't make complete sense. The officer that killed Everard used to work for Parliamentary protection, her disappearance was news before it was known that anything happened, the dates line up with a Parliamentary review into "misogyny" laws, the leader of the movement that sprung up out of her "murder" was a young American feminist famous for calling for male genocide.
Oh and they just got clearance for a woman to do a review into whether the police are sexist, which is a bit like asking Nazis if Jewish power is a threat. Just skip wasting the people's money pretending to investigate and go straight to police "education in misogyny" classes and mandatory chief of women's issues positions at every police department.
The amount of shady circumstances around the Everard saga is mind-boggling.
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
I tend to lean more towards an approach to women that they should be generally housewives and secretaries. Yeah, it's a patriarchy--that's what most successful societies have been in history.
If they want to push this feminist society, then I don't have much more to say to them but they made their bed, now they have to lie in it.
So is there actually a problem where women can't walk around in the UK? If there is I presume it's being raped by migrants.
It seems like they are constantly worried about women walking around, but I wonder if it's sort of like gun control narratives in the US where it's a few scattered incidents they make a big deal out of. So all these women think they are constantly in danger and call for "common sense man control."
No, quite the opposite. It's men that are at risk of being killed walking around, either by other men or increasingly likely by women.
The rate of women being murdered has declined in recent times, while the rate of female perpetrators has increased.
It is indeed, and they all have odd occurrences that don't make complete sense. The officer that killed Everard used to work for Parliamentary protection, her disappearance was news before it was known that anything happened, the dates line up with a Parliamentary review into "misogyny" laws, the leader of the movement that sprung up out of her "murder" was a young American feminist famous for calling for male genocide.
Oh and they just got clearance for a woman to do a review into whether the police are sexist, which is a bit like asking Nazis if Jewish power is a threat. Just skip wasting the people's money pretending to investigate and go straight to police "education in misogyny" classes and mandatory chief of women's issues positions at every police department.
The amount of shady circumstances around the Everard saga is mind-boggling.
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
I tend to lean more towards an approach to women that they should be generally housewives and secretaries. Yeah, it's a patriarchy--that's what most successful societies have been in history.
If they want to push this feminist society, then I don't have much more to say to them but they made their bed, now they have to lie in it.