No, I think he was broke grifter who's writings have inspired other grifters to enable authoritarian regimes and bring about much human suffering.
You are obsessed with him obviously - trying to remove his taint from the name of your chosen tribe - when faced with the hard evidence of how a Jew can be anti-semetic, using a link from your own sourcing, you deflect and evade. Classic subversion. You are working hard to cope, all I have to do is point out your fallacies and you fall apart. Keep seething, maybe dilate a little, just to feel something.
Dude you are a broken record, you haven't caught anyone admitting anything. You have a view of history that wraps your own ideological idiosyncrasies in whatever way is required. You're wasting the time trying to burnish the image of a total piece of shit, to a bunch of people who you claim not to agree with. Your strategies and tactics will not change anyone's mind, to be realistic your strategies probably only help to further cement the idea of shills as mongoloids who fixate certain points in maniacal manners.
But keep sucking Marx off on the daily - the taste of his kosher hot dog has you sprung!
No, I only deny that your thoughts have value. You are so desperate for some kind of little victory against an anonymous - what is your ideal outcome? You think anyone here will suddenly start agreeing with your revisionist history? And that revelation will stop them from seeing "Every. Single. Time." Will it make them stop ignoring what they find in the "early life" section people who tend to think in certain ways?
No, I think he was broke grifter who's writings have inspired other grifters to enable authoritarian regimes and bring about much human suffering.
You are obsessed with him obviously - trying to remove his taint from the name of your chosen tribe - when faced with the hard evidence of how a Jew can be anti-semetic, using a link from your own sourcing, you deflect and evade. Classic subversion. You are working hard to cope, all I have to do is point out your fallacies and you fall apart. Keep seething, maybe dilate a little, just to feel something.
So you admit nazis were authoritarians who inspired on Marx?
Nice!
But for that to happen, for him to be Jewish, he would have had to grow up as one. He didn't.
What fallacies? Care to quote me on that?
Dude you are a broken record, you haven't caught anyone admitting anything. You have a view of history that wraps your own ideological idiosyncrasies in whatever way is required. You're wasting the time trying to burnish the image of a total piece of shit, to a bunch of people who you claim not to agree with. Your strategies and tactics will not change anyone's mind, to be realistic your strategies probably only help to further cement the idea of shills as mongoloids who fixate certain points in maniacal manners.
But keep sucking Marx off on the daily - the taste of his kosher hot dog has you sprung!
So, now you deny your points?
On that note, does that mean all whites should be blamed for what Robin diAngelo says?
No, I only deny that your thoughts have value. You are so desperate for some kind of little victory against an anonymous - what is your ideal outcome? You think anyone here will suddenly start agreeing with your revisionist history? And that revelation will stop them from seeing "Every. Single. Time." Will it make them stop ignoring what they find in the "early life" section people who tend to think in certain ways?
You are wasting your life